Breaking news Feed
- Mists of Pandaria Beta: Spirit gear is coming back in fashion
- Blizzard fixing GAME Australia's mess, giving Diablo 3 to those who preordered
- Common Diablo 3 installation problems and how to fix them
- 6 blue posts you need to read before the release of Diablo 3
- Mists of Pandaria: Black Market Auction House offers rare and removed items
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-04-2006 @ 12:35PM
Jarrett said...
That last sentence and the previous comment make no sense.
You see, Sneaky, Nathan wasn't challenging the factual content of the statement, just the apparent non sequitur of joining two opposing ideas with the conjunction "and".
The original post reads, "However, we all know that WoW isn't without its problems, and it's going to be hard for a challenger to come along and threaten WoW's dominance."
A better writer would have chosen a structure like, "While we all know that WoW isn't without its problems, it's going to be hard for a challenger to come along and threaten WoW's dominance." The word "while" changing the first idea into a dependant clause, and hints to the reader know that a counterpoint follows in the next clause.
Reply