Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-03-2007 @ 3:00PM
Pougen (ER) said...
If you get past the first blue response by Tseric, it's more of the same forum whining. Blizzard intends Warriors to be the primary tanks, they said so, it's just a matter of time before they implement the modifications to make it so. That's why it was in playtest; people just need to have a little patience.
As far as additional tanking abilities by druids and pallys, I'm for it. I have a druid who tanks when a warrior is not available and heals when there is no priest. While he doesn't perform as well as those others could, a small group shouldn't be penalized when one of those two classes isn't available.
Reply