Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-03-2007 @ 11:30AM
Dahlaine said...
The most useful part of this data is the least popular 31 and 41 pt. talents. All of these are drastically underpowered and make their talent trees less desirable because of it.
Blizz should use the rogue trees as a good example for others. The 31/41 are not fantastic and could use some tweaking, but they provide an advantage that is obvious and could not be passed up when speccing into that tree. These should be showboating talents, not reasons for ridicule (lightwell).
Reply