Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-21-2007 @ 6:49PM
Baluki said...
@13: No, the plural is definitely "shamans". I checked several encyclopedias, and they all confirm it. Here's one: http://www.reference.com/search?q=Shaman
--
As experienced as I am with Resto and Elem, I've never specced Enhance (except when levelling, and that was a LONG time ago and I didn't know what I was doing). So could someone explain to me why you WOULDN'T get Shamanistic Rage? It looks awesome to me. Maybe it's not very good for PvP (just like the tree it's in).
--
Another problem with Elemental is that it doesn't offer anything to a group that an Enhance or Resto shaman doesn't, except for Totem of Wrath. Which, in my opinion, is crap; slightly good for raiding, and that's all. Yes, Elem can do some very good damage, but why not just get a Mage with CC? My back-up healing is lousy, and I feel like each heal I cast decreases the short amount of time I can cast lightning bolts by about 5%.
Blizzard really has a lot of work ahead of them. No wonder they haven't bothered.
Reply