I wish you could edit posts, that'd be my next wishlist for things here...

The point is that it's an article on a fairly major website that a whole bunch of people read, and if you're going to be a semi-serious journalist you really should make an effort at being above and beyond what "most people" would to in my opinion.

Surely the mighty hand of AOL can make up some compensation for their reporting team to respec a few times on the live server as well to really get into it, but I think just an analysis of how close the damage is JUST on the PTR between arcafrost/arcafire/fire/frost builds happen to be would be sufficient to show whether or not the changes are significant. I mean it's pretty clear cut right now that fire is the business until you get to a certain level of +dmg and frost comes in a distant third no matter how you spec it. I'd just like to see a bit more depth to the idea and see how well they compare to each other on the PTR, not necessarily how they relate to their live specs right now.

Reply