zomg u has stick?

So the orc warlock can handle the big sticks, the small pointy sticks, but combine the two and somehow, thar be probs. Sure, if this lock can hold it in one hand, then that's doable. But two? Tiny blood elf pallies can totally handle that monster, but there's something about warlockery that changes even the big orcs into weaklings.
Why can't my holy pally hold a dagger? Come on, I promise, she won't even use it; just leech all its stats. I guess pallies just aren't subtle. At all. Attempts to teach stabby stabby by the great gurus resulted in furrowed brows, a few injuries, and several panic attacks. They're going to stick with the elaborate swinging motions, thank ya. On that note, why can't she hold a staff? Pointy staff, no problem. But stickz = idk.
Then there is the drood inability to wield swords. They can channel the powers of nature, shapeshift into formidable beasts, and even harness moon and star energy to zap an opponent into oblivion; but long pointy sticks? Perhaps the elders simply felt that swords were detrimental to the drood granola-halo image. Or, one-too-many accidents while shifting into lolbare and they were all issued pocket knives and dull sticks.
Then there are hunters. We're just too sophisticated to bash stuff with a big club; and you all just be jealous.
What is it that bothers you about your class' weapon abilities (or your rival class' for that matter)? Do you accept Blizz's logic unwaveringly, or is there that nagging little bit that haunts your dreams while napping between raids?
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Odds and ends, Humor






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Taytayflan Jul 8th 2008 12:05AM
You can slit someones throat with an axe, but not a mace.
Why can't rogues use axes?
Sedair Oct 24th 2007 3:08PM
this was great for a laugh. I've often wondered why items are considered "unwieldable". I can understand the logic behind armor requirements. I feel like anyone should be able to pick up any weapon and use it... end of story.
Drayna Oct 24th 2007 3:10PM
Why can't shamans use swords!!!
Come on!!!
The enhancement shammies would love to swing a nice 2h sword instead of an axe or mace anyday...or course a true enhance shammy would dw, but I digress.
Matthew Rossi Oct 24th 2007 3:13PM
I'm a warrior. I can use everything.
Except wands. Can't use them. Can't equip them. I guess we skipped 'how to point a stick at someone' day in warrior school. This doesn't actually bother me, I find it amusing to imagine my massive tauren staring confusedly down at a stick, since no taurens can equip wands.
Verit Oct 24th 2007 3:20PM
Its obviously to balance out loot distribution to a certian extent.
Funny thing too - my human warlock has a +5 to maces (racial ability) right... except I can't equip them.
Paul Oct 24th 2007 3:18PM
I don't know, maybe I misunderstood what the OP was saying, but i see it not as "you are so bad at swords you don't even know how to hold one" but as "you are so bad at swords there's no point in ever picking one up because you would just hurt yourself", so the game just prevents you from doing so.
Stevie G Oct 24th 2007 4:44PM
That exact thing happenes to me? Why can my 'Lock use a stick or a dagger, but not a stick with a dagger on the end?
Addie Oct 24th 2007 3:20PM
I wanna use POLEARMS... okay, really I just want to RP with a pitchfork, but I'm a drood, no can do. *sad face*
erwillia Oct 24th 2007 3:25PM
Let paladins use guns until level 55 or something...That relic slot is useless...
Let us ranged pull something!!!!
innajunglestylee Oct 24th 2007 3:26PM
Sounds like an angry paladin wanted Mindlblade! But from an RP perspective it makes perfect sense. At least from my hazy memories of D&D...
Casters don't DW because their stats don't support it -- not mechanics wise, but RP wise. You think some frail little demonologist or conjurer could pick up a heavy melee weapon? Or figure out how to use two of them at the same time to any decent effect? Staves, by the way, are not heavy melee. They're light.
Paladins don't use daggers because they aren't considered honorable. They are the weapons of sinister rogues, not defenders of the holy light. I find paladins' exclusion from using staves far more arbitrary than daggers.
Warriors and wands: warriors are dumb. Wands require smarts. It's not that hard to envision from an RP perspective. It's the opposite of above. A warrior is like that kid in shop class who can take apart an engine blindfolded and make it better, but can't count past 20 without taking his pants down.
Shamans and swords...well, that's just our lot in life. That one I'll grant makes no sense.
Kuroiban Oct 24th 2007 3:28PM
Why can any class NOT use a gun? You aim it, and pull a switch, it goes boom. That should be the end of the dicussion.
Boom.
Also; why are only rouges allowed to wear the Defias mask? What happened for everyone else?
"And in other news, another Defias mask accident killed 18 warrior, 7 shaman, and a hunter today, as they all accidently strangled themselves trying to put it on. We'd like to remind our viewers that only rouges know how to look that scruffy and cool."
sarah Oct 24th 2007 3:31PM
for halloween, i wanted to dress up all witchy for it, so i got my NE druid a costume and a farmer's broom from a farm near brill. i thought, how fun, i'll dress up my BE palli like this too. so i got her a broom, thinking she would be like a warrior and be able to equip all weapons. but then i soon discovered that she has no idea how to hold a broom, and she never will.
Bobby Hansen Oct 24th 2007 3:29PM
@8: What about Shamans inability to use Polearms? That does'nt make much sense either. YOu'd think a Shaman would be able to use a Spear
outforprophets Oct 24th 2007 5:01PM
There is a kind of RP reasoning behind it. For example, priests aren't allowed to use sharp pointy weapons because they're supposed to be holy and whatnot. So they are stuck with blunt weapons - ie maces and staffs.
Imogynn Oct 24th 2007 3:32PM
The simple answer to your question is why would they?
In RP terms the stats are hidden; your paladin doesn't know that caster dagger would increase his dps over that crumby sword. He's probably thinking "that stupid dagger is a kid's toy."
raldes Oct 24th 2007 3:34PM
How about druids being able to use a dagger for melee damage? We can't double wield nor are there any melee offhand items. What is the point of giving the ability to use daggers, if they are completely useless in the most popular form for druids (feral)?
Barzaar Oct 24th 2007 3:39PM
The one that gets me is that locks and mages can use swords... but priests cannot. Alternatively, we can use maces while they cannot.
Sedna Oct 24th 2007 3:38PM
Droods can't use swords (or axes) not because the Cenarion Circle thinks it's unsporting, but because it really hurts to carry something that long and pointy in your mouth while in bearform. Daggers are hard enough- Malfurion kept getting cuts on his tongue!
Swear to God that's the reason.
dekulink Oct 24th 2007 3:39PM
Why would a Pally WANT to use a dagger? It's not Righteous... and it doesn't make you look much like a knight.
lolz i win @rp ololol
dan Oct 24th 2007 3:40PM
I always got mad that my priest couldn't handle a 2 handed mace. Honestly, a nice big double handed mace, maybe a ret pally weapon, equipped on a shadow priest, how bad ass would that look? They can handle the one handers, they should be able to carry around a 2 hander. RP aside, I know they are supposed to be weak, but GOD it would be cool.