Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-04-2007 @ 12:19PM
Kahja said...
1920x1200. With the second one on the way. Woooooooo
Reply
12-04-2007 @ 12:57PM
Arturis said...
The 1680 x 1050 version is the same ratio as 1920 x 1200, so it will scale up without distortion if you use the "stretch" wallpaper mode. The image wont be per-pixel-perfect, but it wont look any better if I scale it up with Photoshop either, as this is the resolution I created the source images at. Until I can afford to upgrade my display (which wont be any time soon) I most likely will not create wallpapers larger then 1680 x 1050. I will, however, look into a dual screen format (2560 x 1024, for example) when I have the time to do so.
Dual widescreen (3840 x 1200) is right out, unless you want to buy me the two monitors. ^_^