Skip to Content
1-25-2008 @ 10:24AM
They've already confirmed more new stuff than TBC delivered, and TBC was a massive shot in the arm for WoW. Anything more than that will be a nice addition, but not necessary by any means.Warhammer is a rip-off, and imo a poor one at best. Not a factor.
1-25-2008 @ 10:33AM
warhammer is not a rip-of what came first warhammer or warcraft? Warhammer. I hope they ad 1 more new hero class, for it is not good if all goes DK
1-25-2008 @ 10:40AM
It is highly unlikely that everyone will play DK. The rune system alone will rule out a fair number of people from doing much more than rolling one just to see. So far we know that play mechanics like the pally seal/judge system and the shaman totem system keep those classes much less popular than the more straightforward classes. I think we're going to see a lot of that with the DK's too.
1-25-2008 @ 11:05AM
imparush said...warhammer is not a rip-of what came first warhammer or warcraft? Warhammer.You're almost right. The original Warhammer has been around for decades. It's the newest online version that's the blatant ripoff.
1-25-2008 @ 5:57PM
Games Workshop hired blizzard to create a game based on warhammer, GW pulled out, Blizz reworked the story and images and created Warcraft. If GW has any complaints, they can only blame themselves.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.