Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-25-2008 @ 2:30PM
Richard said...
@Xeren:
Blizzard has proven time and time again that stuff that "can't be done" is actually doable, but they don't want to put the programming hours into it.
Why don't they really want flying mounts in Azeroth? Because all of the off-limits areas are so poorly rendered or literally just flat spaces that it would be embarrassing for them... so instead of re-rendering areas that are effectively useless, they just say, "no, can't do it" and leave it at that.
It's literally a beancounting thing: They decide if X hours of programming time at Y dollars per hour is better spent creating fully customizable gearsets or working on the latest and greatest instance/zone/expansion. And shipping new product which means more sales will always win. Boatloads of profit or not, they still have a budget over there and a finite number of hours in which to code things.
It sucks, as ultimately a lot of things go unfinished or forgotten.
But it was just my personal wish-list, feasible or not.