Curse launches oddly familiar WoW database
There are quite a few WoW database sites out there. Thottbot was the first big one that I was aware of; other big sites include Allakhazam, the Goblin Workshop, and of course Wowhead. Then there are some lesser-known contenders (at least to me; it took me a bit to come up with them), like WoWd.org, WarCry (I use their news constantly, but never saw the database), GameAmp, WoW Guru, WoWDigger, and TenTonHammer (again, I know TTH for news, but didn't know they had a DB).
And now Curse, long one of the big names in Add-On and news sites, is throwing their hat into the ring with the very capitalized WOWDB, which appears to be in beta right now. It seems like a pretty complete database; it's got all the items, quests, NPCs, and so on that you would expect from a serious act like Curse. But hold on a minute, doesn't it looks a bit similar to a certain other WoW database siteof which Curse doesn't seem to be too fond? (Update: Curse has contacted us to say that the linked article wasn't written by anyone on their staff-- instead, it was posted by a user of their site, and that they have no ill will towards Affinity Media or Wowhead). Ignore the Wrath of the Lich King-esque blues for a second, and...oh. Oh dear. Well, at least it's a good design they're copying from, I suppose. See the gallery below for more comparison screenshots. What do you guys think -- is this within the bounds of inspiration and homage, or a blatant rip-off?
Update: Someone named Kody, who claims to be a representative of Curse, has appeared in our comments, and claims that Curse has obtained an "exclusive content contract" with WoWWiki for the use of their information. An interesting claim, especially since most of the content on WoWWiki (written by users) should be covered under Wikia's terms of use and the GNU Free Documentation License, and thus available for use to anyone who credits and sources it. We've sent requests to both Kody and WoWWiki for more information.
Another update after the jump.
Update 2: Kevin Van Ness, Content and Community Manager for Curse, has officially responded to us, saying that he recognizes the similarity between the two sites, and says it's the result of the creator, who had previously been working on a Lord of the Rings Online database that was also very similar to Wowhead, creating a design that was "very much inspired by Wowhead." (WoW Insider notes that it is up to Wowhead, the originators of the design, to decide whether it is a result of inspiration or a blatant ripoff.)
Van Ness also points out that the WOWDB design includes a number of unique features, and says that Curse will implement more in the future.
On the subject of WoWWiki, Van Ness says that Curse entered an agreement with WoWWiki to create a portal to the wiki via their site, and it is WoW Insider's belief that their use of WoWWiki content on WOWDB falls not under any "exclusive contract agreement," but under the standard Wikia Terms of Use, which allow any site to reprint Wikia content, as long as it is sourced, credited and licensed appropriately.
Update 3: WoWWiki (and Wikia) have confirmed the information above.
And now Curse, long one of the big names in Add-On and news sites, is throwing their hat into the ring with the very capitalized WOWDB, which appears to be in beta right now. It seems like a pretty complete database; it's got all the items, quests, NPCs, and so on that you would expect from a serious act like Curse. But hold on a minute, doesn't it looks a bit similar to a certain other WoW database site
Update: Someone named Kody, who claims to be a representative of Curse, has appeared in our comments, and claims that Curse has obtained an "exclusive content contract" with WoWWiki for the use of their information. An interesting claim, especially since most of the content on WoWWiki (written by users) should be covered under Wikia's terms of use and the GNU Free Documentation License, and thus available for use to anyone who credits and sources it. We've sent requests to both Kody and WoWWiki for more information.
Another update after the jump.
Update 2: Kevin Van Ness, Content and Community Manager for Curse, has officially responded to us, saying that he recognizes the similarity between the two sites, and says it's the result of the creator, who had previously been working on a Lord of the Rings Online database that was also very similar to Wowhead, creating a design that was "very much inspired by Wowhead." (WoW Insider notes that it is up to Wowhead, the originators of the design, to decide whether it is a result of inspiration or a blatant ripoff.)
Van Ness also points out that the WOWDB design includes a number of unique features, and says that Curse will implement more in the future.
On the subject of WoWWiki, Van Ness says that Curse entered an agreement with WoWWiki to create a portal to the wiki via their site, and it is WoW Insider's belief that their use of WoWWiki content on WOWDB falls not under any "exclusive contract agreement," but under the standard Wikia Terms of Use, which allow any site to reprint Wikia content, as long as it is sourced, credited and licensed appropriately.
Update 3: WoWWiki (and Wikia) have confirmed the information above.
Filed under: Odds and ends, News items







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Kody Feb 4th 2008 6:24PM
Just a quick correction: WoW Guru's developer isn't who created WOWDB. But yes, the developer was very inspired by the design of Wowhead; you should have seen his previous database website. :)
Wowhead has done an amazing job creating a clean, easy to use layout; it or layouts similar will probably become the standard for design in the future, just as World of Warcraft's interface layout is quickly becoming the typical layout for an MMO interface.
Blake Feb 4th 2008 7:39PM
It's bordering on a straight copy there. There's different ways to lay out data. WOWDB seems to have just copied WowHead from top to bottom.
Alch Feb 4th 2008 7:42PM
Then again this site looks like 50,000 other sites so...yea.
Blake Feb 4th 2008 7:47PM
You mean all those other sites in the same network owned by the same company. Yeah, it looks like those.
Nonny Feb 4th 2008 8:02PM
Key words there: "Owned by the same company."
simplevintagex Feb 4th 2008 7:43PM
Makes me sick to see such an obvious copycat. I guess that's what happens when you can't come up with good ideas on your own and rely on others hard work for your own benefit. ;)
Oh well, I'll never visit it, Wowhead will always be the better database.
Forthefun Feb 4th 2008 7:56PM
It looks as if it were the same website but with a different skin .
Regis Feb 4th 2008 8:25PM
Actually there already was a Wrath of the Lich King theme for Wowhead:
http://www.wowhead.com/?forums&topic=9679&p=98266
Tarot Feb 4th 2008 7:51PM
I think it's fair to say that's a pretty blatant copy. All that's changed is a couple icons, a few background colors, and a font or two. Looks like someone copied all the images, copied the source, and put it back together again... Wonder how similar the source code on the two is. *goes to check*
Sean Riley Feb 4th 2008 7:59PM
Blatant copy, says I. And I don't have any problem with this article, but...
I am reading a WoW website talking about a WoW website and how it is similar to another WoW website, all without any actual link back to WoW.
I feel special.
Nonny Feb 4th 2008 8:04PM
It's basically the same website with a different skin and text paraphrasing.
I wonder if Wowhead might have a legal case against Curse should this make it out of beta in its current form.
Ametrine Feb 4th 2008 8:20PM
If this was any more of a Wowhead copycat, there'd be a rocket on the front page.
Zamous Feb 4th 2008 8:25PM
Not surprising, they looked like they have ripped off other sites like the old rupture beta too. I am mean honestly, why re-invent the wheel when it is so much easier to steal.
Regis Feb 4th 2008 8:28PM
Coming up with new ideas, making progress, keep your self respect. Honestly, if there is something I hate in this world it's people that plagiarize others original ideas (and yes Wowhead was original, and it still delivers new features)
Tridus Feb 4th 2008 8:34PM
Geez, thats just awful.
Curse should be ashamed of themselves.
Magnetite2 Feb 4th 2008 9:01PM
Well, at least there are a few improvements over Wowhead - no drilling down in menus to see spells and so on.
It also gives an alternative for those who aren't impressed by the virtual monopoly Zam have over things these days...
jason carlton Feb 4th 2008 9:11PM
Well isn't this a clear case of the anus calling the pucker wrinkled... wowhead was greatly inspired from thotbott... granted this wowdb is bordering on a clone.
Bearskunk Feb 4th 2008 9:19PM
inspired yes, but not a 1:1 copy even in the beginning.
Fletch Feb 4th 2008 9:28PM
If they want to give me a wowhead that isn't owned by IGE, more power to 'em.
bluenebula Feb 4th 2008 9:52PM
WoWHead isn't owned by IGE. They get no power.