Skip to Content
2-06-2008 @ 3:52PM
I agree with you that it's 'Your $15 per month'... However, it's 'My $15 per month' as well. If I get my enjoyment out of winning instead of losing, you are directly affecting the 'return on investment' of my $15. You have every right to enjoy yourself, just as I, and every other player, does. That being said, (and I mean this as an honest question, not a criticism) what's stopping Blizzard from doing away with battlegroups all together and having small bracketed battlegrounds like previously suggest, maybe even one for every level? That would certainly level the playing field on a per-level basis, as well as a per-realm basis for those weighted heavy in one particular faction. Out of the vast number of realms, I wouldn't think that there would be any trouble populating a BG per level.Or maybe an additional option; if a player didn't want to play with only their level, they would be able to join a 5 or 10 level tier to try their hand at playing with the big boys.I guess my biggest gap in knowledge would have to do with the way the servers connect, and whether a no-battlegroup scheme would work at all. Barring that, it sounds like a great idea to me!
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.