Featured stories Feed
- Know Your Lore: Gul'dan, Doomhammer, and the nature of the Horde
- Totem Talk: Restoration and the Throne of Thunder, Part 4
- The Queue: No sleep till Orgrimmar
- Around Azeroth: Close encounters of the blurry kind
- Breakfast Topic: Should Blizzard brake base XP while preserving boosts for experienced players?
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-10-2008 @ 4:03PM
dan said...
Crushing blows are amongst the only reason raids even take a prot warrior these days.
Reply
2-10-2008 @ 4:07PM
Matthew Rossi said...
They'll keep taking them. It's Shield Block that creates warrior uncrushability, not defense.
2-10-2008 @ 4:09PM
Aerei said...
Or, you know, maybe it's the fact that they generate the best single-target threat against single mobs of any tank class? That is, the fact that they can hold a boss, and allow DPS to go all out, much better than a paladin or druid.
Says the Prot pally, even.
2-10-2008 @ 4:14PM
dan said...
I understand that Matt. The op implied heavily that this was a sign of the removal of the crushing blow mechanic not just a text change for accuracy. That's what I was commenting on.
and Aerei bears are fantastic threat generators since they're not as penalized as warrs due to static threat formulas. Static threat is singularly the great prot warr problem today.