Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-18-2008 @ 7:29PM
Scionicle said...
The warlock example doesn't make much sense in this case. You're comparing a +crit talent nerfed to fit the "standart" 5% with another talent that's already at the common 70% pushback resistance :/ If you're going to put reason in your rants, better keep doing it till the end. Anyway, start chanting "Reason is stronger than my hate for warlocks", it might help!
Reply
2-22-2008 @ 11:48AM
Angus said...
Actually, look at it this way...
gladiator 4pc set bonus goes from 70% to 50%
Hey, remember that common pushback, you cited? Well we had it and it was changed to 50%. How would you like your "common pushback" of 70% changed to 50%? They didn't cite for reasons of consistancy, but it would have been obviously a lie then.
Mace spec, 6% stun. Not being touched. Why?
If it was for consistency it is being applied unfairly and only to one class. How is that even remotely fair?