Why is Kael a bad guy?

Lore-wise, I can't say I understand the direction they've taken with a number of characters from classic Warcraft games in BC, but I suppose that's the reason that the term "lorelol" was coined in the first place. Mike Schramm's pointed out that the canon can probably take the abuse, but there's one character in particular whose upcoming story arc kind of appalls me.
If you're trying to stay unspoiled for patch 2.4 -- why are you reading WoW Insider anyway? -- I'll slap the rest behind a cut.
A young woman arrived in another flash of light. As she went to stand by Antonidas, the high elf's gaze followed her with troubled, brooding intensity. But Jaina Proudmoore took no notice; she was utterly focused on her duties. The handsome prince didn't stand a chance.
Her vivid blue eyes spared Kel'Thuzad a curious glance. She took the box from Antonidas, who explained, "My apprentice will see to it that the chest and its contents are incinerated."
The woman inclined her head and teleported from the room. Across the room, the high elf frowned at the spot she had vacated. Under other circumstances, Kel'Thuzad might have found the silent drama amusing.
-- excerpt from Road to Damnation
Kael'thas always kind of interested me. Here's a guy who was relatively young for a Blood (then High) Elf during the events of Warcraft III, studying magic in Dalaran, getting a hopeless crush on Jaina, and who was by all accounts a nice guy. Think of him as a senior at an out of state college who then gets word of massive trouble at home and bolts off to help. Arthas steals his girl, kills his dad, wrecks his homeland, singlehandedly plunges the Blood Elves into the desperate state of magic addiction they're suffering from as BC begins, and then takes off looking for more power. Kael gets home, rallies the few surviving elves, and then marches off to help the Alliance (who, lest we forget, birthed the same guy who'd destroyed Quel'thalas in the first place). He does this despite the fact that most of the elves are sick and weak, himself included, and he doesn't yet know why.
If you've done the "Curse of the Blood Elves" campaign from the game, you know that Kael's contingent gets screwed by both the night elves (Kael arrives late to the Alliance camp because he gets caught in the spitting match between Maiev, Tyrande, Malfurion, and Illidan) and the humans (Garithos has the colossal gall to to deny the elves troops needed to defend the Alliance position and then imprisons them for accepting help from Vashj and the naga when it was either that or be annihilated). "This victory would not have been possible without (their) aid," Kael correctly notes. "Though I fear I may have doomed myself by accepting it."
You can read transcripts of the campaigns here (don't forget to look at the NE campaign for Kael's portion and an awe-inspiring look at the hair-pulling matches that apparently define NE political life), and they're a pretty damning indictment of the circumstances under which the Blood Elves left the Alliance and picked up at the start of BC. It's tough to accept Kael as a potential villain down the line: he's one of the game's most open and tolerant characters, manages to get very difficult jobs done despite a total lack of support from his military superiors, and asks to be punished in the place of his soldiers when Garithos goes off the deep end. That he's able to do this at all shortly after the death of his father and most of his people, and suffering terribly from what was then an unknown sickness, is a testament to the strength of his character in Frozen Throne:
Prince Kael'thas: Please, milord, spare my men! It was my decision to --
Garithos: Spare your breath. I never trusted you vainglorious elves. It was a mistake to accept you into the Alliance in the first place. Now, at long last, you'll be dealt with approapriately. Take them away!
Characters like Vashj -- I can understand making her a raid boss. She was always a pretty vicious piece of work, and if you can survive Phase 2 Vashj without wanting a nuclear strike called on Serpentshrine Cavern, you're a better person than I am.

But Kael? Seriously? Clearly a smart, thoughtful person who's left with no illusions over the horrible position the Blood Elves are in after Arthas' joyride through Quel'thalas. You don't finish Warcraft III thinking, "Yeah, this guy's a potential mass-murderer." I was disturbed enough running some of the early Draenei quests and seeing hints of him as a megalomaniac. The quest lines in Netherstorm just made it worse. Kael's descent into evil only makes sense if you accept BC's somewhat baffling premise that his madness in Outland was a fait accompli; it's the Pre-Evil For Your Convenience approach to storytelling. I think it would bug me less if it weren't for the sheer potential of examining how he fell -- or, alternately, at least not totally slaughtering his characterization from WCIII.
With patch 2.4 approaching, we're seeing Kael's final end in a 5-man dungeon. This time that hold-out hope of "He's not really dead" from the 25-man Tempest Keep -- The Eye raid no longer applies, unless they manage to retcon him into WotLK somehow (I have to say that the possibility of Arthas finding redemption in the next expansion is kind of irritating when his Horde counterpart is given no such care; but, as we've noted, this isn't necessarily a new trend). There's another oddity here -- namely, that newer players to the game or alts will be killing the 5-man, "broken" version of Kael before wounding the 25-man, "unbroken" version -- but eh, that's the normal rough-and-tumble of MMORPG life.
So I don't get it. Why, out of all the characters in the Warcraft universe, was this guy picked to fall into irredeemable evil?
Many thanks to Pulyx (Paulo Henrique) for the use of his image above. The full piece can be seen here at his DeviantArt gallery.
Filed under: Human, Lore, The Burning Crusade, Blood Elves, Draenei, Odds and ends, Analysis / Opinion, Patches, Night Elves, NPCs






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
lollercycle Mar 5th 2008 6:40PM
that YTMND is beyond epicness 1st xD
Xioyn Mar 5th 2008 7:47PM
What is the name of the Song in the back ground?
Super Guest Man 9000 Mar 5th 2008 11:22PM
Its a traditional Finnish folk song "Ievan Polkka" by Loituma.
valisil Mar 5th 2008 6:52PM
I totally agree with you! Kael is my favorite lore character and the reason I rolled a Blood elf.
darian Mar 5th 2008 6:52PM
You're forgetting several key parts of WarCraft III.
Kael condemns his people much as Grom Hellscream did. He explicitly accepts that lacking a source of magic he must turn to Demonic sources through Illidan. The very idea should be madness, and at first it is. However, he slowly makes decisions, seemingly necessary ones, that push him further from the "straight and narrow" as it were.
For me, it wasn't hard to accept that Kael'thas went off the deep end. He had already started and made significant progress before we meet him in WoW. What confused me was his split from Illidan. I never quite understood why he "switched paymasters", which he was so thoroughly dedicated to Illidan in WarCraft III.
Allison Robert Mar 6th 2008 12:59PM
Lady Vashj: There are other founts of power in this world, Kael. Demons, for instance.
Prince Kael'thas: You speak of madness, my lady. We will never be that desperate.
He doesn't start off accepting much about his situation - and I'm not sure he ever really explicitly says, well, why not use the demons, they're here anyway. Vashj, in breaking him out of prison, tells him that he can either sit there and let his people be killed by the Alliance, or head to Outland. Afterwards Vashj makes reference to the fact that the Blood Elves seem to be getting stronger in Outland, which I can only assume marks the point after which Kael took advantage of Illidan's offer -- but Kael's spent this whole time observing his vastly weakened people and goes to the end believing that all of them would have died without magic.
You're right; it's probably a series of decisions that at the time seemed absolutely necessary to make. Kael might be more properly described as a tragic hero, in which case I still don't understand his treatment in BC. It's not enough to read quest text that "Kael has descended into madness!" from a Scryer.
Lanth Mar 5th 2008 6:55PM
I very much agree. In WC3, he's portrayed as a man (elf?) loyal to his men. The reason he sides with Illidan is so his people can live a better life in Outland. But then he switches over to the Legion for more power?
Does not compute!
elspath Mar 5th 2008 6:55PM
mostly its just another Arthus story of one trying to help his people and getting taking to the depths of hell for all his troble... Not like its orginal and i bet we will see more "greate nice guys and women" leaders get lead down the path of Raid boss oblivion...
To bad it is sad but its not unthinkable in blizzards mind. The legion can do anything they want and turning a pure good guy to evil isent out of there range of power...
only thing that upsets me about this is i love the Blood Elfs and Personally i would rather see things go back so there High Elves again.
But He is still there leader, statues of him all over the city and npcs singing his name on the street corners.... Are the blood elfs the only race that has really no true Leader? The ranger Captin is just a stuweret by the way, not the real king or prince of silvermoon...
Shadow946 Mar 5th 2008 6:59PM
gj missing the whole point of the post lollercycle.
I do agree that Blizzard's approach with Kael'Thas is confusing, but there isn't much to go back on now. I felt the same way about Illidan. Imprisoned for 10 000 years for trying to help the night elves, and shunned by his people, and he continued to try and help them.
I'm still holding out for the whole 'Naaru are evil and Illidan was actually good' theory.
Allison Robert Mar 6th 2008 1:11PM
There are an increasing number of hints that the Naaru life cycle encompasses both amazing light and insane darkness - and they may very well be ass-kicking raid bosses as well. Multi-taskers!
Kal Mar 5th 2008 6:59PM
Yeah, I think you're leaving out some key parts of the timeline.
Like KT's deal to get magical power to feed his people. Which was demonic. Then his issues with Illidan and wanting another power source. Or his issues with both the horde and alliance. Or imprisoning one of the Naaru.
I don't see why he should be such a mwahaha villain, but he's in the mold of other warcraft heroes that turn to villainy - he was corrupted by demonic energy and kept going after it.
Alternately, you can say that basically anyone around Jaina is doomed, and he was just the latest.
Cat Mar 5th 2008 9:54PM
Should we put Thrall on notice, then?
Odok Mar 5th 2008 7:21PM
The path to hell is paved with good intentions.
Kael may have had his people's best interests in mind, but that doesn't change what he did. He willingly turned to Demons to slate his thirst for magic. It's the exact same thing that happened to the Orcs. Kil'jaeden appeared to Ner'zhul to offer aid against the "threat" of the draenei. Nevermind that the draenei weren't a threat in the first place, just like the true extent of the elves' addiction is unknown. He was manipulated and damned for it. Not to mention things like attacking Tempest Keep are wholly uncalled for. Kael bought into Kil'jaeden's lies and got swept up in the fervor of the times. I wince to make the comparison but stuff like this happened in Germany during WW2.
And it's not like Kael just snapped his fingers and became evil. It was gradual. First was the loss of innocence at the Sunwell's destruction. Then what happened in TFT caused a big dissociation from the Alliance, leaving the elves in a state of fearful desperation. That makes them easily to manipulate, and after a while Illidan or Kil'jaeden could make them do anything in the name of what's best for their people.
Allison Robert Mar 6th 2008 2:40PM
See, the key portion where I have to disagree with you is over the extent to which Kael "willingly" did anything. He is the de facto leader of the Blood Elves after his father's death, and he doesn't have the freedom to make choices on his own behalf anymore. So what I question of him now is this: is the position he's put in following the fall of Quel'thalas virtually ensure his fall from grace if he continues to do what (in his belief) is best for his people? And, if so, why wasn't this story arc more central to BC?
Freezer Mar 5th 2008 7:33PM
Ive always liked Kael. Normally I cant stand Elves, and he's one of the only reasons you see me rolling a Blood Elf at all. It's kind of sad to see that Kael doesnt end up being redeemed in the end.
The one thing I really hope to see in WotLK is a new Blood Elf leader coming and stepping forward. The Blood Elves are the only faction whose leader is unrepentantly evil, let alone the fact that he's now dead. Hopefully we see the current regent Lor'themar step up and do something in Northrend. It is kind of encouraging to see the leader of the Blood Knights get a bigger role in 2.4, maybe she can step up now that Kael is gone.
Tuberon Mar 5th 2008 8:22PM
I think it's pretty safe to say that Lady Belfadin is going to be a more important person in the politics of the blood elves.
She's basically responsible for them siding with puzzle piece jesus and working with the SSO.
Matdredalia Mar 5th 2008 8:19PM
I think my husband summed up the reason Kael is now "evil" very, very well:
"He was an amazing hero, a great leader, and extremely brave and honorable ---- and the Alliance spit on him and by the time all was said and done, where did he have to turn?"
Matdredalia Mar 5th 2008 8:22PM
And for the record, I believe Kael is redeemable.
However, I do not believe Arthas could ever be redeemed in my eyes. Out of the entire history of WoW that I've ever heard, there are only 6 people I can not see being redeemable:
Arthas = King Asshat
Sergarus
Kil'Jaeden
Archimonde
Azhara
Xavius
Baluki Mar 5th 2008 8:23PM
Don't think of the Magister's Terrace Kael'thas fight as taking place before the Eye Kael'thas fight. Each patch pushes the game's storyline forward a little more, but naturally you can't just shut down a dungeon because the final boss has been defeated by someone. This is where Lore and Gameplay clash, so you just have to learn to live with both.
In the second BlizzCast, Metzen said that he thinks of BC as taking place about a year after WoW Classic as it was on release. Since there were 12 version 1 patches, it's probably safe to assume that the time period (lore-wise) between each patch is about a month. In BC, since there have only been 4 major patches, I suppose you could say that each one is a season, perhaps. So from that perspective, Kael'thas was defeated in the Eye months ago, and in a few weeks he'll be returning to Silvermoon to summon Kil'jaeden.
WLK will probably take place a year after the Dark Portal opened, or a few months after Kael'thas and Kil'jaeden were thwarted at the Sunwell.
Heleth Mar 5th 2008 11:37PM
No it certainly takes place after it. Read the transcripts of his speech in TK, his speech when someone turns in his quest item ("i'm not dead haha!") and his speech in MT.