Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-12-2008 @ 10:15AM
nativebrown said...
Blizzard is a private company.
They are under no obligation to explain who they banned, and why they banned them.
Get over it.
Reply
3-12-2008 @ 10:52AM
Makros said...
You are correct. They are a private company, and they don't have to explain themselves. However, they ARE a corporation in a consumer industry and therefore must answer to the consumer in order to continue in this industry.
They could, as a private company, suddenly halt and delete EVERYTHING WoW related, destroy all the servers, and say tough luck. They won't however have the respect of any of the ten million people signed up to play this game which would make future endevors virtually impossible.
Consumer opinion is the only thing that keeps Blizzard in line. Everything they do is to keep as many people happy and paying as possible.
What they did here is ban someone for pointing out what he percieved to be flaws in the system. People have as much a right to be enraged by this as Blizzard does to do it.
3-12-2008 @ 11:50AM
guesswho? said...
Blizzard is not a privately-held company they are a division of Vivendi games which is a publicly traded firm.
3-12-2008 @ 3:06PM
Rich said...
Even though they are a publicy traded company (as being part of Vivendi) they still don't have to answer to anyone but Vivendi. They don't have to answer to the consumer.
The consumer can scream and holler and complain all they want, until it starts to hurt Vivendi, nothing will get done. One Huntard on the forum isn't going to hurt Vivendi. So get over it.