Skip to Content
3-12-2008 @ 7:58PM
I find both these posts rather ironic, partly because Blizzard did infact respond but mainly because you seem to suggest that the forum CM's aren't acting fairly - when infact they would have been applying unfair favoritism if they had let crimsonlocks get away with abuse, that would have landed anyone else a ban, because he has contributed good in the past.The whole tribute to the european CM's is neat, I'm an avid user of the european boards and I much like our CM's - but I also very much doubt they would have handled this differently. At least I can't think of a single time where our CM's have responded to a temporary simply because the community demanded it. And how can they?There are forum rules and they apply to everyone, and crimsonlock left blizzard no choice when he broke them in such a verbal manner.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.