Skip to Content
3-13-2008 @ 5:26PM
Yeah, but it's not the expected link in the sentence that mentions what you'd _think_ would be the link to the forum message: "[...]as Blizzard poster Belfaire has stated in no uncertain terms that Blizzard has no problem with the practice in a post on the customer service forums." Up to that point it's fairly reasonable where the links go - a reference back to recent coverage of multiboxing, linking to prior coverage of the debate over multiboxing and a link to the definition of multiboxing, fine, but then it comes to a screeching halt when the "Blizzard has no problem" link directs you to a destination that has already been linked. It wouldn't be _as_ bad if the author didn't indulge in link spaghetti after that point, but I'm not going to scrub over every link looking for the one that's the magical link to the referenced forum discussion.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.