Blizzard creates pages for BC dungeons and raids
Continuing their trend of improvements no one actually asked for (hello, combat log!), Blizzard today released pages on all the raids and dungeons to be found in Burning Crusade, with the notable exceptions of Magister's Terrace and Sunwell Plateau (but maybe they'll come later). For each dungeon or raid, the pages have the following information: location, number of players, level range, associated faction, theme (Karazhan, for instance, is "Haunted Wizard's Tower"), key, reset timer, number of badges, abbreviation, final boss, and a link to the loot table.
None of that information is new to experienced players, but it will probably help those new to the high-level game. The real draw of the pages, for me, is the nice explanations of the backstories behind some areas and individuals, which is helfpul because I haven't fully played Warcraft III yet (though I am working on it; I'm in the middle of the expansion right now). Blizz also promises that the pages will feature dedicated screenshot galleries for each instance soon.
Some of the abbreviations are not consistent with what I'm used to. For instance, Old Hillsbrad is given as "Old Hills;" I've never seen anyone say that. Not that I talk about that place a lot, but usually it's OHB. They put "SC" for what I always call "SSC," and although I have seen "Ramparts", "HFR" or "Ramps" is more common on my server. But the rest of the information is (of course) correct, and I always like it when Blizzard fleshes out their sadly neglected official site. Neglected in some parts, anyway -- have you had a look at the class descriptions lately?
None of that information is new to experienced players, but it will probably help those new to the high-level game. The real draw of the pages, for me, is the nice explanations of the backstories behind some areas and individuals, which is helfpul because I haven't fully played Warcraft III yet (though I am working on it; I'm in the middle of the expansion right now). Blizz also promises that the pages will feature dedicated screenshot galleries for each instance soon.
Some of the abbreviations are not consistent with what I'm used to. For instance, Old Hillsbrad is given as "Old Hills;" I've never seen anyone say that. Not that I talk about that place a lot, but usually it's OHB. They put "SC" for what I always call "SSC," and although I have seen "Ramparts", "HFR" or "Ramps" is more common on my server. But the rest of the information is (of course) correct, and I always like it when Blizzard fleshes out their sadly neglected official site. Neglected in some parts, anyway -- have you had a look at the class descriptions lately?
Filed under: Blizzard, Instances, Raiding, The Burning Crusade, Guides







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Liel Mar 31st 2008 9:37PM
Quote"Continuing their trend of improvements no one actually asked for (hello, combat log!)"
Um I find the new combat log pretty nice...
Eliah Hecht Mar 31st 2008 9:39PM
Oh, don't get me wrong, I like it to. I'm just saying it was a surprise when I saw it in the patch notes -- it's not one of those things we saw coming.
AlmtyBob Apr 1st 2008 5:32AM
The new combat log was sorely needed. I can see how to most people it can seem unnecessary but there were big problems with the old one. Lack of any filtering, mods having to parse text out of the log instead of getting events (huge), GUIDs for mobs (huge-er), and oh, hunter traps were OP 8).
BTW, why easy-mode 90% of the game and, of all things, make VR a harder fight?
Adys Apr 1st 2008 9:47AM
Stupid. The Combat Log changes had been announced while 2.3 PTR was still up. The entire community has been asking about it since ages, and then cheering about it. You call that journalism...?
Stupid.
MartinC Mar 31st 2008 9:57PM
LOL, you think nobody asked for improvements to the combat log? You must be seriously out of touch.
Just about every advanced addon relies on the combat log, and addon creators have been asking for improvements to the combat log for years! Omen, Recount, and others were prepping for the much awaited changes to the combat log months before 2.4 went final.
Eliah Hecht Mar 31st 2008 10:00PM
Out of touch with AddOn development? Admittedly, yes.
So apparently that wasn't the best comparison. You get what I mean though :)
Kyle Kartz Mar 31st 2008 10:19PM
Haha, if us Moonkin ever had reason to think Blizzard doesn't care about, the class descriptions page is it.
nekkiddo Apr 1st 2008 12:23AM
I believe that part where it says Aquatic form was intended as Moonkin form.
Alex Mar 31st 2008 10:24PM
Nice to see the little dune joke in the description of SSC: "Whoever controls the water controls Outland."
Alexisonfire Mar 31st 2008 10:40PM
The raid list is just odd. I mean, most of the instances seem to follow the trend from easiest to the most difficult of the encounters. But ZA before Mag? SSC, ZA, and Mag before Gruul's? That's just messed.
And I could have sworn that Kazzak and Doomwalker have a 40 man limit.
RichM Apr 1st 2008 12:58AM
Changes we definitely DID NOT ask for:
- new Whirlwind sound
- new Power Word:Shield sound