Blizzard tells Oceanic realms they're fixing it

Players have, for the most part, provided excellent documentation to Blizzard concerning the stability. They have done so in a massive thread over on the Customer Service Forums, and it is actively being monitored and commented on by Syndri, a Blizzard representative. The thread was started on March 31st, with the issues appearing a couple weeks before that, and is still active today.
The analysis: There is a lot of Blizzard hate going around about this issue. We've received numerous emails on the subject, and taking a look around the internet and the official forums show the same feelings. This is, in my opinion, unfounded.
Blizzard has came out and said that they know the issue is happening, that they're looking into it, isolating it, and attempting to fix it. They're well aware that people are having issues playing the game – and they want to fix that. It's in their best interest as a business, and as good people (the folks working there are good people, remember). However the acknowledgement by Blizzard doesn't seem to stop a horde of people from saying they're being ignored: they're not. Syndri even makes an appeal to the masses: "By all means, vent your concerns and experiences herein; that's what this thread is here for. But don't-and I do ask this sincerely-ignore the attention that this matter has truly received."
The often quoted line that the internet is a "series of tubes" isn't that far from the truth. It is a bunch of fiber optic cable strung around the globe, shooting particles of light this way and that way. One of Humanity's greatest technical accomplishments has been getting all these tubes to talk to each other. Every once in a while, something is going to go wrong, and there'll be some miscommunication. This can take a long time to fix; but fixed it will be.
Syndri has come out and said that after 12 days of lag and issues, there is still no fix. They are still working on it. That means that they have a team assigned to diagnose the problems and try to fix them. Syndri even acknowledges the severity of the situation, in that the issues are affecting hundreds of thousands of customers.
I'm interested to hear what some Oceanic customers think of this. And feel free to disagree with me, but I'm pretty happy with Blizzard's response here. They're active, acknowledging the problem, and are attempting to fix it. Besides the actual fix, what more can you ask for?
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Realm Status, Blizzard, News items






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Fetters Apr 13th 2008 4:18PM
Everyone knows Blizzard has a switch on the servers that they can flip from "Broken" to "Fixed" whenever they want.
Obviously they're ignoring the problem.
Schadow Apr 13th 2008 4:40PM
Amazingly enough, trivialising real issues makes them no less real.
Schadow Apr 13th 2008 4:29PM
Very simple: We can ask for local servers. The servers for Oceanic players are located in California - half a globe away.
Think there may be lag traveling halfway across the world? I do. Think there would be less lag if the server was located locally? I do.
There is no latency advantage whatsoever to playing on an Oceanic server versus playing on a West Coast server. The Oceanic servers do not have a different maintenance time to the US servers. The rule is "don't schedule any raiding for (our) Tuesday night, because the server will shut down".
The only advantage to "Oceanic" servers is that they attract "Oceanic" people, so in theory they play at a similar time. In practice, this covers a wide variety of time zones and even languages, so it's almost as difficult to find a guild playing in my time (New Zealand) as it is on a West Coast server.
So to recap: No latency advantage, can only schedule events 6 nights out of 7, and now server stability and lag issues. Sounds idyllic, doesn't it?
So the masters of MMO fantasy have created yet another fantasy: That their paying subscribers down under are being attended to. The reality is a far cry from that.
Will Apr 13th 2008 6:17PM
Give. Us. Goddamn. Servers. Within. Five. Thousand. Miles.
That's right, the servers are more than 5000 miles away.
Chris Apr 14th 2008 4:55PM
I second that motion!
Alexis Apr 13th 2008 4:38PM
problems??? what kind of problems??? arghh!!! *hits head on thetable!* i've just inserted a new game card around 26 or 27th marchonly to find out my next coming weeks wont be a peaceful one.
the lags starts from 8am (+8 GMT my time) all the way until 2am... theonly wonderful hours i have is from 2 until 8. i cant play.. wait.. iCANT EVEN LOG IN TO MY BANK ALT TO JUST TAKE STUFF FROM MAIL FORGODSAKE! after logging in, straight dc after 5 seconds. after attempt#56238172 i've managed to get 1 mail and decided i'll try it againlater.
and guess what??? i'm actually now sleeping at 6pm and wakingup at 2am just to play on those no-lag hours. wtf man... they shudjust refund my bloodly play-time back. its 30 bucks u know!?
plus how come other servers in US realm list doesnt lag at all?? i mean they r still same servers with oceanic right? whats the difference?? i play at other servers besides the oceanic onces and they r just working fine.
Gazoo Apr 13th 2008 4:43PM
Blizzard has been telling Oceanic players, from the very beginning, that it is not economically feasible to host local servers. This has been said eleventy billion times. There arent enough Players (including all of Oceania) to make it worth the investment of a new building and infrastructure in Oceania.
Blizzard offered the current setup and this was overwhelmingly voted for by Oceanic players. Let me repeat that for the A.D.D affected Oceanians in the crowd... you CHOSE the current system. You voted for it, you voiced your support for it, you asked for it to be implemented. Now you have exactly what was offered and ratified by the Oceanic majority.
Don't believe it? Go look it up in the Blue post archive.
Stop whining about local servers which you chose not to wait for, and realize that current lag problems have been acknowleged by BVlizz and they are working on it.
rick gregory Apr 13th 2008 4:48PM
Um... What was their choice if the alternative of local servers wasn't going to happen? Any vote is only meaningful if you have 2 viable alterntives. If it's 'play on west coast servers set to oceanic time or don't play at all' those are NOT meaningful choices.
Bayard Randel Apr 13th 2008 6:52PM
It is entirely feasible - Sony are hosting Pirates of the Burning Sea realms in Australia in partnership with BigPond.
Gryphon Hall Apr 13th 2008 6:58PM
A lot of us on Oceanic servers weren't even subscribers yet when this was decided by what was then a minority.
Still, though I feel that Blizzard is doing what they can (and would rather wait and see) I feel it is about time that we have our own local servers. I'm quite sure there are enough of us now to make it financially feasible.
rick gregory Apr 13th 2008 4:47PM
I'm not oceanic, but... of course there's blizz hate going on. I mean, it's fine and all to say 'we're looking into it' but it's irritating as hell to have server stability issues 3+ years into agame after a patch. It speaks to inadequate testing and the fact that it's still there 2 weeks later means that they 'we're paying attention' line starts to wear thin.
It's one thing when an external issue with their ISP causes issues, but when a patch gets deployed that's down to Blizzard. Heck, how many issues have we seen with the US servers lately? At some point they need to actually figure stuff out and not break it with patches. And if something DOES slip through they need to fix it faster.
Oh and for the inevitable 'you don't know how complex software is...' comment.. I do. I've been in software development for 20 years. And if my product was shipping server breaking bugs 3 years into the cycle I'd be pissed.
Runstadrey Apr 13th 2008 5:16PM
I'm not Oceanic either, but I seem to remember hearing that WoW China recently hit a million distinct accounts (or some such metric).
Question: Are these million players also hopping the big water to west coast servers? Or are they being hosted in China? Due to security concerns, I doubt the Chinese gov't would allow 1M unmonitored internet connections.
It would seem that if the Chinese can get their own servers, the Oceanic types should get some too.
catbard Apr 13th 2008 6:59PM
Even if Korea hosted the Oceanic servers, it would be an improvement. I wish Blizz would at least take this initial step.
Darknamett Apr 13th 2008 5:33PM
I think that China's wow is beinh hosted in China or somewhere in Asia because it Is econimically feasible to host a local server there becuase of the huge population but Oceania has too little people to setup local servers there
Fraufrau Apr 14th 2008 4:10AM
It is just as economically viable to operate the Oceanic Servers in Australia or Malaysia or the like. There isnt as many servers catering specifically to Oceanic players so obviously not quite as much infrastructure to invest in - besides the obvious fact that the Oceanic world isnt some kind of 3rd world region when it comes to internet technology.
The issues that Blizzard has said is causing the server instability and ruining game time/experience has been admitted to as a process that Blizzard had implemented to operate on their servers during off-peak periods... oh but wait! The world is round the earth has multiple time zones and not everyone on the planet is a f*cking american.
Welcome to the Globe.
John Apr 13th 2008 5:41PM
If the same issues hits the US-players, do you think it will take them ~2 weeks to fix?
wow Apr 13th 2008 5:49PM
Mr Holisky your carrying on like your paid by blizz.
If people want to show how annoyed they are let them.
Rasnarok Apr 13th 2008 5:51PM
I play on Barthilas (Oceanic server) and live in Australia. Since patch 2.4 went live we've had a consistent latency of around 700ms and lag spikes every few hours of 5000-7000 throughout the day. This makes the game completely unplayable (especially as a hunter trying to weave my steady shots between autoshots).
We are certainly not at fault by saying Blizzard has ignored us. Yes we now know that they have been working to fix this since 2.4 went live but they didn't say anything about it. If Blizzard doesn't communicate with its customers and let us know when they know of a problem and are working on it, how are we expected to stay quiet about it.
It hasn't been the first time Blizzard has ignored oceanic customers regarding latency and I'm sad ito say it probably won't be the last.
Due to the distance from Aus to where the servers are, of course we will experience a little more lag than the Americans. However, when the norm is around 400ms and then it's taken up to 700ms with 5-7 second lag spikes every few hours then it is completely unacceptable.
I don't expect them to build oceanic servers down here, that would be completely unreasonable as we have a fairly low player base down here (relative to say, the United State's player base). However I would like to see this problem with 2.4 resolved and I'm grateful that Blizzard is working hard on it.
Bayard Randel Apr 13th 2008 6:48PM
Why don't you expect them to build Oceanic servers? It's certainly feasible.
SoE (Sony Online Entertainment), have set up genuine Oceanic servers for their new MMO Pirates of the Burning Sea in partnership with Telstra/BigPond.
Ultime Online has had genuine Oceanic servers for years.
If any company has the resource to make this possible, it's Blizzard.
Ruleofthumb Apr 13th 2008 5:56PM
I play on Jubei'thos. Probably one of the worst (lag wise) servers on the Oceanic side. We face multiple "realm down" times throughout the day, where Jubei'thos is completely offline. Where not only Azeroth, Outland, or the instance servers are down, but the entire realm. And you're considered lucky if you have a