Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-25-2008 @ 9:10AM
Savant said...
So if more bag space would cause resource issues for Blizzard, then why not increase stack sizes? Why not stack cloth to 250? Why not stack ore to 100? One could easily argue that Blizzard is responsible for people needing so many bag slots because they have made stack sizes artificially small.
They shouldn't complain about resource constraints when they could reduce the number of resources needed to store materials by simply increasing stack sizes.