Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-28-2008 @ 3:33PM
darian said...
It's true it would be nice if Blizzard could be more forthcoming, but at the same time I can understand why they aren't.
The sheer number of mechanics, and how frequently they're tweaked behind the scenes, would require a cadre of full time staff to keep updated properly. To boot, the vast majority of populace doesn't delve far enough into the game mechanics to make use of more than [/roll]% of the information.
I'm okay with them looking at that situation and deciding it isn't worth their time, but it'd be nice if when the CMs answered game mechanics questions they were a lot more specific with their language. Half of forum explosions seem to come from CM posts where it's easy to misread, and hard to figure what interpretation is correct.