Interest group speaks up against Blizzard on Glider case

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

5-06-2008 @ 9:37PM

mensrea said...

Copyright infringement may still fly. "Harassment" would get laughed out of court. Distributing a product that someone doesn't like isn't harassment. Distributing a product that others use to harass someone isn't harassment.

As for what's more "defaming" to Glider (wtf?), who cares? It'd be "more defaming" if they accused them of murder... so maybe they should do that? Besides, a successful harassment claim wouldn't bring in anywhere NEAR the damages that copyright infringement would... and that's in the nearly impossible scenario that they could get harassment to stick.

There's just not a single instance of harassment going on here whatsoever.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.