Is it really OK for Arthas to be 10-mannable?

So one of the most exciting announcements from the recent flurry of news about WoTLK, at least from my point of view, is the that there will be 10-man and 25-man versions of every raid. Think about that for a moment. Yeah, that's right. That means that you and 9 other friends will be able to scale the heights of Icecrown Glacier and topple Arthas himself from his frigid throne.
This has more than a few people worried.
The worries are many. Will this mean people won't want to do the the 25-mans when they can have the same experience in a 10-man? Mike pointed out in one of our conversations in WoW Insider's secret lair that we were originally told that even 40 level 80s wouldn't be able to take down Arthas. Some are concerned that we really shouldn't be able to take down one of the most powerful entities in Azeroth, and possibly in the Universe, with only 10 people. I think all of these worries are addressable.
What about the Lore?
There's actually been some telegraphing that we'd get some type of change similar to this due to lore reasons for a while. Ever since last year, Blizzard has been talking about making WoTLK more "personal" and making sure people at all levels of the game have a chance to invest themselves in the lore by giving them a chance to interact with major figures such as Arthas. They've already started applying this philosophy in game with the Magister's Terrace, where five people can take down Kael'thas Sunstrider.
In that case, the 10-man/25-man split makes a lot of sense. Letting more people have a crack at Arthas and participating in his downfall makes a huge amount of sense and should make the story a lot more personal for a lot more players. Beyond that, even if you are interacting with Arthas all through the whole leveling process, if you're also shut out from taking the guy down at the end, it might end up being a bit of a buzzkill.
Beyond that, we should realize that the lore power-level of an encounter doesn't always directly match up to the game difficulty rating. After all, as Drysc points out, the Gnomes were chased out of their city by a level 28 that could be soloed by a single Ironforge Guard, and the Trolls by a level 10 and his level 7-9 minions. By a similar token, you can bring a conspiracy that spans half the Eastern Kingdoms and threatens to topple Stormwind to its knees with a group of 5 people of levels 17-20 or so. If all that isn't epic enough for you, 5 level 70s can take down a malevolent force from beyond our reality with the power to destroy worlds with a mere yawn in the Shadow Labyrinth. I could go on all day, but it's pretty obvious that number and level of people required to defeat an encounter doesn't always have an impact on the exact significance of the encounter from a lore or storytelling perspective.
Does this mean it will be too easy?
Another concern of people is that defeating Arthas shouldn't be as easy as jaunting into Karazhan with a bunch of people in assorted dungeon blues and clearing the place in 3 hours. Drysc offers a reality check on that as well. All 10-mans will not be created equal. Even today, there are groups who can clear Karazhan but still struggle with Zul'aman, or at the least have never managed a complete timed clear of the place. Similarly, you shouldn't expect to be able to simply waltz into 10-man Icecrown Glacier, kill Arthas, and go home. Yes, you'll no longer have to coordinate 25 people, but you'll still have to coordinate 10 people, and the dungeons will be constructed with a definite progression in mind. 10-man Icecrown Glacier is sure to be much harder than 10-man Naxxramas, even more so than Zul'aman is tougher than Karazhan. 10-man will still be a challenging progression in its own right.
Does this mean no-one will want to run the 25-man?
Honestly, our own Matthew "The Vykrul" Rossi has probably covered this about as well as I ever could. There's still plenty of incentives for the 25-man raider. There's likely to be bigger challenges from the bosses and more opportunities for more classes. In addition, there's definitely going to be better gear in the 25-mans. This has been confirmed. And since Arena gear will probably still need ratings in Season 5, more people will probably return to raiding as a way to get the best gear -- and I'd bet quite a bit that if Frostmourne is a drop, It won't be coming from the 10-man version of the instance.
Does this mean they went back on their word?
Sure, at one point some CM or Developer said that you'd probably have to have at least 40 level 100 characters to defeat Arthas or something like that, but... things change. Drysc makes a good argument about it -- A Good game company should be adapting and changing. The idea should be to make a game that is fun and accessible to as many people as possible. If this means that you need to make a few changes to earlier decisions or design philosophies, that is something to be celebrated and encouraged, not maligned. In this case, Blizzard is looking to open up the story and encounters of the game in a way that allows a much larger portion of the player base to experience them and have a feeling of investment in the game world. That is a good thing.
Final Thoughts
I really do applaud this move by Blizzard. It's a gutsy one, but one I ultimately see as being beneficial for the game as a whole, at all levels. They're allowing more people to invest themselves into the lore and story of Northrend, the Scourge, and the game world in general. 25-manners will have more challenging encounters and better loot to look forward to, while 10-manners can progress through the story as well, challenging themselves at their own level. Wrath of the Lich King should evolve World of Warcraft into an even more enjoyable game for everyone, and that is certainly in part thanks to innovations like the new 10 and 25-man split.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Blizzard, Instances, Expansions, Raiding, Lore, Bosses






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
Robert May 10th 2008 8:08PM
Why do people keep calling him Arthas? Its the Lich King we will be killing!
The lore for WoW is impossible to keep consistant, because if they did, it wouldnt be the game it is today, the lore is only for certain people, not everyone goes out and reads it.
kid May 10th 2008 10:30PM
Yeah, i think it does scale quite a bit but think about it. I don't think blizzard will end up letting 10 people kill arthas (or the lich king) the same way as 25 people would. Maybe the bringing back of the ashbringer has something to do with the story line where your 10 man raid jsut has to keep waves of scourge away from the lich king battling an/multiple npcs...
just thoughts
SaintStryfe May 10th 2008 11:54PM
When the people of Azeroth tell stories, it won't be XXhaxorXX took down Illidian Stormrage, it'll be how Maiev with her allies did it.
I bet they'll use the same out on the Lich King
Taytayflan Jun 7th 2008 10:11PM
@SaintStryfe
That makes me think, that "(insert Scarlet Fanatic/Lich traitor/some npc) and his/her allies killed the Lich King," and how people are saying 10-people are too few to really kill him, what if isn't just a 10-man raid.
What if it's 2 raids.
The Lich King is a huge danger to life everywhere, could that get the Horde and the Alliance to work together, like at the Battle for Mount Hyjal? 2 10-mans of separate factions might be hard to pull off with game mechanics, because emotes don't' tell a hell of a lot, but a joint effort would make perfect sense lore-wise.
VIrusz May 10th 2008 8:12PM
Well, actually, none has been confirmed that we will 10 man him, It's still on the discussion table, but I doubt that'll happen anyway! and after all, things are subjected to change kekburlol
clegane May 11th 2008 4:36AM
The point here is the embracing of the 10 man raiding format and giving it a true progression path spanning several instances. The two instances in BC, just wasn't enough content to support a 10 man raiding guild. This new format will be perfect for my group.
This change will motivate me to reactivate my account. Our 10 man group went into cold storage due to the lack of 10 man content after ZA, and this promise of true 10 man progression that we can all play through together will bring us back, in force, for sure.
I don't care if it steps on a few "hardcore" toes. 1+ year of Karazhan runs was hell. Thanks for the change Blizz! /clap /victory
Ves May 10th 2008 8:11PM
IMO, power-wise whether it makes sense for Arthas to be 10-manned is a non-issue, considering there was never a chance of us 25-manning Arthas to begin with. Illidan was 27-manned, and I suspect Arthas will require even more to take him down.
Erika May 10th 2008 9:03PM
I think this would be a great time to bring back the 40 man raids.
Ella May 11th 2008 6:37AM
@ Erika
I agree. I would love to see 40 man raids for Arthas.
Matt May 11th 2008 3:04PM
@ clegane
You had a 10 man raiding group? and your gonna reactivate your account because they are making everything super casual? woot you couldnt either A. recruit 15 more people B. show 15 other people your a strong raid group C. suck at life.
lol this whole 10 man and 25 man instance crap makes me sick... its not easy to put together a good 25 man raid, and now your making the content accessivle to everyone by giving them a gimped version with lesser rewards...to me this screams #1 laziness, #2 that the challenge and prestige from killing certain bosses will all but dissapear. shoot if i could have a 10 man version of the game id have seen the content and been done MONTHS ago...whats keeping me here is wanting to see that content, and needing 24 other people to do it...it will cause a large portion of people to get burnt out very quickly...i fear this may hurt blizzard more then help them. people will all see the content, and then...become bored. This will definately cause a drop in subscriptions, you heard it here first...the drive to see illidan, and sunwell is what keeps people playing, if you give them everything on a platter, it will lose its value and become boring...
my .02
Zhalseran May 10th 2008 8:15PM
My personal opinion is: who cares? As long as the fight feels epic I don't really care if I do it with 10. Blizzard is a smart company, they know what they are doing. We don't have anywhere near all of the information, so theres no sense in fretting over the unknown, especially when it's in such capable hands.
Balasan May 10th 2008 8:37PM
Who cares?
Lore nerds like myself, for one, cares. Arthas/Lick King is one badass mofo. He brought down Illidan with one swift strike of Frostmourne. And that was before he merged with the powers of the lich king.
Sure, 10 more levels is a big thing. But it feels so wrong that it needs 25 level 70s (total level= 1750) to down illidan, but only needs 10 level 80s (total level of a measly 800, not even half that needed to kill illidan) to down the big undead bastard. 25 level 80s needed to down the lich king makes more sense.
It's important to use lore nerds because we saw how Arthas went from a noble paladin, into an obsessive compulsive freak, who's final nails in the coffin was the culling of Stratholme and the picking up of Frostmourne. We wanted to kill him, he was that big a threat to Azeroth (though some may love him, I dunno). He was growing from good to damn evil supreme.
So, for me, no. No 10 man killing Arthas. It would appear to me to even be anti-climatic if that happens.
Jordrah May 10th 2008 9:16PM
balasan, if you care so much, dont you do the 10man version of arthas and leave all of those that dont give a f*ck alone. play the game how you wanna play it and leave everyone else the hell alone.
Andrew May 10th 2008 9:38PM
It's pretty simple; our levels are concepted as exponential increases in power. 11-20 provides twice as much power as 1-10, and pinnacle levels provide even more increases in power; no one argues that a level 60 won't even break a sweat beating up a level 50. Heck, a level 60 doesn't have much trouble beating up a level 57.
Level 71-80 will more double the power of a level 70 player, so just adding up the total number of levels isn't an accurate metric. Just as Onyxia (formerly a 40-main raid at 60) can now be 3-manned at level 70, it's pretty obvious that Illidan will be a pushover to geared 80s.
Zhalseran May 10th 2008 9:44PM
You completely missed the point here. I said I don't personally care. As in me, a non lore nerd. Sure I can see why lore nerds would be concerned but I am not one so I am not concerned.
Even if I were, my statement would still apply. We know nothing at all about the encounter, the dungeon, the events leading up to or following the encounter, or anything else for that matter. Once again, there is no reason to freak out about what we don't know.
Daniel Whitcomb May 10th 2008 10:19PM
Balasan,
As a lore nerd, I have to say that I have no problem with killing him with 10 people. I've discussed that a bit in the article, but here's another thought.
By now, even a casual player's character is going to be powerful. Assuming they quested to level and didn't just sit and grind somewhere, by now now they have bought low dragons and elementals lords, saved whole kingdoms, and dismantled cults and conspiracies. They are acknowledged as among the most powerful heroes of the age by everyone from Khadgar and Mu'ru to Tyrande and Thrall. At this point, We, the PCs, aren't faceless footmen. We are the hero units of the game, just as Malfurion and Arthas and Illidan were of the last game.
Given this, it's no surprise that 10 of us could have the power to take down someone like Arthas. His power is probably mostly in his army anyway. Once we carve through that, we can face him one on one.
Besides, We will probably have some combination of Jaina Proudmoore, Sylvanas Windrunner, Tirion Fordring and Bolvar Fordragon assisting us, both in the 10 man and the 25 man, so if you prefer to have a "hero" present, there you go. I maintain that there ARE heroes present even without them though. Those heroes are the 10 or 25 Player Characters who have fought through Naxxramas, Wyrmrest, Zul'Drak, and likely 2 or 3 other citadels, before finally coming to the Icecrown Glacier to face down Arthas himself, the Lich King.
Joe P May 11th 2008 12:07AM
^ this
As a lore nerd I think what most lore nerds are forgetting is the fact that you the player are one of the most central characters in the game. We're basically the next generation of heroes and as Daniel said throughout the game we have made foe and friend alike, toppled many evils, and overcome many obstacles. It is not unheard of, therefore, that by the time we reach Arthas we would be powerful enough to defeat him considering the battles we have fought before.
I think the whole 10/25 dungeon thing is such a non-issue and is getting blown out of proportion by the "hard core" crowd. Undoubtedly there will be advantages to 25-man raiding such as gear and probably a few other treats Blizzard will throw in, but the bulk of the game will still be accessible to the casual and/or smaller guilds which is how it should be. If the "hard core" crowd feels that making the game more accessible somehow diminishes their achievement then, no offense, they need to grow up some.
Eternalpayn May 11th 2008 11:32AM
"He brought down Illidan with one swift strike of Frostmourne."
Not true. Blizzard said it was an epic fight, but the cutscene was taken out.
schwonga May 10th 2008 8:25PM
I'm betting that if indeed there is a 10 man version of lich-king it will be drastically different from the 25 man. That almost goes without saying, but hear me out: remember Star Fox 64? You could go the easy way, the medium way or the hard way depending on how well you did on the previous level (brilliant design by the way) But my point is that the final boss was just a measly robot that was pathetically easy and short time to kill, but it wasn't the true Andros.
I bet cash money thats what blizz does with Lich boy here. The 10 mans will go into the thrown room, take out some sort of twin copy of the guy, and the story line can go and say you have destroyed the evil king's body, but his demon soul is too strong to be so put down... But then a 25 man comes in and BAM, thats all she wrote, for reals this time.
Gazoo May 10th 2008 8:28PM
Wow gets dumbed down even more. Amazing.