Arcane Brilliance: Building your Mage, part 1: Raiding
Arcane Brilliance comes to you every week from the top of Archmage Xylem's tower in Ashzara. Yes, in between sending wave after wave of power-hungry Mages to kill Morphaz over and over and over again, the Archmage finds the time to put quill to scroll and conjure forth a weekly Mage column for WoW Insider. Just kidding, it's actually just some guy at a computer who writes these, and all Xylem does in between giving quests to unwary adventurers is walk from the bottom of his tower to the top and back again. It's a boring life to be sure, but all I do between typing paragraphs is walk from the computer to the fridge and back again, so who am I to judge?
When people who don't play World of Warcraft find out I play the game, a common question I get is "what level are you?" It isn't always asked that way; those unfamiliar with basic game mechanics might not know what a "level" is precisely, but the intent is the same. If they care to ask questions at all, they frequently want to know how "far" I've gotten in the game. Progression is a basic ingredient in video games, and when I tell them I'm level 70 (I generally leave out the part where I explain that I actually have two characters at 70, and between all my alts I have gained over 400 levels across 14 characters, so as to avoid getting the "oh, you're a crazy person" look from whoever I'm talking to), and they learn that 70 is the highest current level attainable, they typically assume I've "beaten" the game, that I've completed it somehow.
The problem, of course, is that WoW doesn't work like that. Hitting level 70 is definitely a milestone, and a genuine accomplishment, but it is nowhere near being the end of anything. If anything, level 70 is the flaky crust through which you must chew to access the real meat of the game. Frequently, characters will clock far more playtime after level 70 than they ever did while they were still gaining experience points.
Last week we discussed the myriad options available to a newly minted level 70 Mage, and I suggested a checklist of things to do to improve your character once that particular plateau had been crested. This week we'll begin going over one of the most important decisions a Mage needs to make at endgame: nailing down a talent spec. After the jump, we'll discuss some common raiding builds, what each build is good for, and how you can tweak each spec to match your play-style.
As you have no doubt discovered while leveling your Mage to 70, Mage talents are divided into three major schools. The Fire tree is generally considered to be the high-damage tree, containing talents that provide the best raw DPS in PvE environments. The Frost tree is often thought of as the PvP tree, offering survivability and control, while still allowing for high damage output. The Arcane tree is less defined, and mostly serves as a complementary tree, lending utility and support talents that help either of the other schools of magic.
As I suggested last week, one of the most vital choices a Mage makes at end-game is what his or her focus will be. Is your Mage going to strive for PvP dominance? Is topping the damage meters in high-end raids your goal? Would you like to be serviceable in both raids and PvP? Is your Mage going to be used to farm primals, and nothing more? Your end-game goals should determine your spec, and your spec choice will largely determine your success at achieving these goals.
There are those who insist that there are only one or two "ideal" or "best" builds for each kind of end-game Mage. I have to vehemently disagree. A spec choice should be a deeply personal decision, and one that suits you particular style of play. I have seen successful PvP Mages with fire specs, and high-damage raid Mages slinging Frostbolts. There are as many ways to be good at end-game as there are Mages who reach level 70, and don't let anyone mock the choices you make. If you find a build that matches your methodology, and you can be successful with it, then that is the right build for you. A week later, you may discover that another build is the right build for you. The real variable in this equation is what works for you, and what works for each individual Mage is simply never going to be constant. There is no perfect build, no ideal spec, and cookie-cutter builds only work if you happen to be a cookie-cutter Mage. I prefer to look at those kinds of builds as a jumping-off point, as a template from which to begin customizing and adjusting to fit your needs and strengths.
Now, this isn't to say that nobody is wrong, and everyone is right, and we should all hold hands and sing Kumbaya forever more. Cookie-cutter builds exist for a reason. Certain talents just lend themselves to certain roles, and playstyle doesn't change that. Below, I will present a few basic builds and list the strengths and weaknesses of each. In the end, how you tailor your own build is completely and entirely up to you, but the builds below can hopefully provide you with some ideas and suggestions for where to begin the customization process.
I could probably spend weeks talking about this subject, but in the interest of expediency, I'll limit it to two. This week, we'll discuss raiding builds, and next week we'll go over PvP builds and situational builds.
Raiding Builds
Fire 10/45/3 (+3)
Purpose:
This build maximizes the damage output for a Fire Mage's staple spell, Fireball. The rotation this build is designed for is simple: Scorch until the fire vulnerability debuff is stacked to 5, then spam Fireball until the enemy is dead, pausing only to reapply the Scorch debuff when the need arises.
Pros:
High, consistent DPS is the hallmark of this spec, and mana efficiency is provided by Elemental Precision, Arcane Concentration, and Master of Elements. Burning Soul is a must-have since it is the only threat-reduction talent in the Fire tree, and by going so deep into that tree, you have access to the wonders of Combustion. As with just about every quality raiding spec, Elemental Precision is essential, providing what amounts to 3% spell hit.
Cons:
This is a pure raiding spec, which of course means zero survivability. If you take this build into a battleground, find a tree and hide behind it, since that's your only chance to survive more than a few seconds. If you take a wrong turn and find yourself in an Arena with this spec, it was nice knowing you. The points spent in the Arcane tree here serve one purpose, and that's to provide access to Clearcasting, and it's a shame to have to spend 10 talent points simply to allow for a little more mana efficiency, but there just aren't any other options for a Fire Mage to lower their mana expenditure.
Ways to tweak this spec:
Three talent points are discretionary here, though not much you can do with them will help with what this build is designed for. Picking up Pyroblast and Blast Wave is a good idea, since you've already invested the points necessary in the Fire tree, and those spells are useful in a lot of situations. The last point is superfluous, really, and can be used wherever you see fit.
A common variation on this build is the following: 2/45/11. This provides added DPS by adding Icy Veins, at the expense of the mana efficiency provided by Arcane Concentration.
Arcane 43/0/11 (+7)
Purpose:
This build takes advantage of all the wonderful DPS talents in the Arcane tree, allowing for very nice sustained damage using Frostbolt and Arcane Missiles.
Pros:
The Arcane tree is a fantastic thing, allowing for high DPS no matter which school of spells you prefer to use. This build provides a solid backbone of spell damage and allows you flexibility in the rest of the build. It can work well with fire or frost spells, and is a fun build to customize. This particular version of the build gives access to Icy Veins, which is never a bad thing.
Cons:
When you choose the Arcane tree, you are sacrificing the potency of specializing in one of the other trees for the overall spellpower the Arcane tree offers. Your DPS will be high, but it could probably be higher if you chose Frost or Fire and tailored your gear around it. Also, any spell rotation that involves Arcane Missiles will likely be less mana efficient than is ideal.
Ways to tweak this spec:
There are many variations on the Arcane build for raiding, including but not limited to the following:
40/0/21 focuses on Frostbolt as its main damage dealing spell, and goes deep enough into the Frost tree to obtain Cold Snap.
40/21/0 gives you Presence of Mind/Pyroblast flexibility for PvP, while maintaining high DPS for raid encounters through the use of a Fireball rotation, at the high cost of the virtual spell hit provided by Elemental Precision.
This build can also be easily tweaked to provide survivability for PvP, at the expense of DPS. If you wish to dual-purpose your Mage, the Arcane tree is your friend. This spec is extremely flexible, and there are myriad ways to change it to suit your needs.
Frost 10/0/49 (+2)
Purpose:
This is designed to give you access to the full Frost tree, including the Water Elemental, while still giving you Clearcasting. The damage here is done almost exclusively through Frostbolt and the Water Elemental.
Pros:
As any Frost Mage will tell you, being able to summon that Water Elemental is a glorious thing. This is another decent dual-purpose spec, due to the PvP control and survivability the Frost tree offers. For sheer utility, the Frost tree can't be topped.
Cons:
The damage dealt here won't be quite as high as it could be if you were to spec deep Fire, but the difference isn't as wide as you might fear. The cost of a dual purpose spec is the pure, unadulterated DPS a more one-dimensional spec provides, and the Frost tree just isn't quite as one-dimensional as the other two trees.
Ways to tweak this spec:
There are two talent points left up for grabs here, and a couple others that could be spent elsewhere. Ice Barrier is a wise pickup for any sort of PvP or soloing. Several talents that don't help much in raiding situations could be dropped in favor of going a little deeper into the Arcane tree in search of the mana efficiency provided by Arcane Meditation, for example 18/0/43.
Hopefully these build templates will provide you with a starting point for building your raiding Mage. These are only a few examples of what you can choose to do with your Mage once you hit level 70. We're given 61 talent points to spend, and 192 places to put them, so the permutations are virtually endless. What specs work for you?
Next week we'll explore the player-killing side of things, and yes, you can PvP without a Water Elemental by your side. I promise. It's not easy, but it can be done.
Filed under: Mage, Analysis / Opinion, Raiding, Guides, Classes, Talents, (Mage) Arcane Brilliance







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Kyp May 17th 2008 4:44PM
2/48/11
Jeanluc May 17th 2008 6:36PM
Seriously, 2/47+/10 is the way to go. 10/48/3 has been relegated to the past. How can you raid without IV? I know I can't.
Zenboras May 17th 2008 4:44PM
So.... you don't have Frostbite, but you have Shatter and no arctic reach? Not my style :P I find Arctic reach very valuable, I dont pvp but I think it the extra range helps, and I know that for raiding it's pretty much a necessity to out range boss abilities.
Christian Belt May 17th 2008 4:56PM
Oh absolutely, Arctic Reach is a good one, and one I would definitely take since I PvP frequently. Its raid utility is good too, so you'll get no argument from me. I'd probably switch around Improved Cone of Cold there, and take Arctic Reach instead. I have nothing against Frostbite, either, though its utility in raids is dubious. That build is not presented as the ideal, but a sort of basic template from which to make the changes that fit you personally, and the changes you would make are indeed good ones.
zetathran May 17th 2008 4:57PM
I enjoy both pvp and pve, and dislike respec costs, so I find that deep frost (2/8/51) works pretty well for both.
Druid dude May 17th 2008 4:57PM
Kind of off topic here but...
The screen shot with this article shows 15 gold for a respec. This is obviously photoshopped. I have not seen a respec for anything but 50 gold for so long I can't even remember. Of course playing a Druid that may have to respec 2 or even 3 times in a single raid might have something to do with that.
Druid in a Mage article... I'm gonna go now before I catch a Fireball to the face.
/stealth
Christian Belt May 17th 2008 5:03PM
Interestingly, I took that screenshot on my own Mage in-game about 15 minutes before I posted the column. I don't know, 15g is what the lady in Undercity wanted to charge me, you'll have to ask her about her pricing strategies.
I did crop it in photoshop before I pasted it into the article, though, so you're right about it being photoshopped.
Druid dude May 17th 2008 5:24PM
15 gold... thats it... Nerf Mages!
SaintStryfe May 18th 2008 8:15AM
If you haven't respeced very many times, it costs less. And if you go 30 days without respeccing, it costs half.
I think it costs me 10 right now on my Shaman, because I stick to Enhancement.
Jim May 17th 2008 6:12PM
Pure frost (0/0/61) is also a viable raid spec. IMHO, the maximized AoE, chill, shatter and range is more useful than the occasional clearcast.
Matt May 17th 2008 6:56PM
jim,
i agree except you are missing 2 points in arcane subtlety allowing your spell hit cap to be lowered to 164 with the addition of elemental precision. i dont see why anymore than 2 points should be spent in arcane, it is a WORTHLESS TREE.
and ive done equal if not better damage as a frost mage than as a fire mage. take into account that frost mages dont need to cast a supplemental spell to put their buff on a boss. their frost bolts add the crit to the mob, and a firemage has to waste mana on scorches...if it wasnt for SSC i would STILL be a frost mage, and STILL be on top of the meters. Fire is ok, but only works if you have icy veins and 1-2 extra fire mages in the raid to help with scorch wasting less time to adding a buff and more time for fireballs / dots
Jason G May 17th 2008 7:13PM
yea, i havnt earned all my points yet since im only 48, but ive spent all of the ones that i had in frost and its treating me nicely in pve. dont know about pvp yet. so ive skipped all the cone of cold stuff since i dont use it as much. im enjoying ice barrier a hell of a lot and now my eyes are set on only one thing...
Jim May 17th 2008 7:15PM
Yeah, excellent point. I just respecced thanks to your suggestion. (And it only cost me 15g, honest).
Shikadude May 26th 2008 2:52AM
To Matt:
These are m personal opinions contradicting wit yours. I'm not trying to change yours but I do have disagreements with you.
1: The arcane tree is not worthless.
2: I don't know what you're doing, but to me fire seems to
do more damage that frost.
3: You're acting like scorch is worthless and MUST be done.
a. Scorch is optional.
b. It is actually very good, and with fireball doing already
more damage, It can be very rewarding.
citroid May 17th 2008 9:55PM
another crap article about mages. You fail to address the #1 fire raiding spec, 2/48/11. That is the best build to take for maximum dps & dpm.
Roxton May 17th 2008 10:08PM
It depends on your gear. If you've got the two pieces of tier 5 giving you the 20% damage, and if you have enough mana batteries in your group, you can put out more damage than any fire mage. However, it requires a lot of crutches.
Warcloud May 18th 2008 4:38AM
Yes he did. It's in the variations of 10/45/3
Ytsejam May 18th 2008 10:48AM
Wow no love for the Arcane Heavy mages, I consistantly top DPS meters with my 48/0/ Rest in Frost build.. Fire Mages even with IV cant touch me, Consistanly in BT/Hyjal Im breaking 1500-2000 dps. Frostbolt/Fireball as a backup for Arcane? Are you joking? With 2 piece T5 and Arcane Blast? If I have a shadow priest I don't even think about casting anything else besides AB.. Also being arcane your hit cap is only 75 so the rest I've been personally stacking Haste/Spell Damage, some might say thats wrong, but WWS doesn't lie. If I get my 4 piece T6 I might think about spec'ing to fire, but for sheer bang for the buck Arcane is awesome.
J. A. S. May 17th 2008 7:51PM
I confess to being ignorant of any non-frost mages, but an old raid leader of mine used a pom pyro mage. Are those out of fasion now?
Roxton May 17th 2008 10:08PM
Yes. They are. And good lord, that raid leader must have been a while ago because I'm struggling to think of ANY instance ever where POM pyro was a good idea. The problem is that you just can't do any sustainable DPS. With a bit of tweaking you can sort of make it work, but you'd be far better off with a more normal PvE spec.