Officers' Quarters: Jerk message of the day

Every Monday Scott Andrews contributes Officers' Quarters, a column about the ins and outs of guild leadership.
I've spent the past six weeks talking about raiding, so I think it's time to get away from the topic and talk about something less drama-ridden, like the guild message of the day feature. What could be more straightforward and less controversial, right? Well, as this week's e-mail reminds us, no part of leading a guild is completely free of incident.
Would rather not name the guild but it's on Bronzebeard EU. Only the Guildmasters (of which there are 10) can set the message of the day. Despite this security, an offensive homophobic message of the day appeared one day. I'm afraid I didn't see it as I wasn't online while it was up, but when another Guildmaster saw it, it was immediately removed. No one owned up to it and no one could think who would do it, so one Guildmaster (a friend of mine in real life) logged a complaint with Blizzard to try and find out who set this message.
He spent a couple of weeks chasing an answer but in the end they said that who set the message was private account information that they would not give out to someone else (great cop out isn't it :) ). And there we are stuck! A couple of guildmasters left for more hardcore raiding guilds, so maybe, hopefully it was one of them . . . but I guess we'll never know. Can you think of anything that could be done to avoid this or controls to avoid this kind of offensive message?
The only way to avoid this situation is to make sure the people who have access to the GMoTD are trustworthy and responsible people. If your own officers prove that they aren't, then the guild leader can actually modify the permissions so that only he or she can change the message. But there is no built-in censorship to this feature aside from the one that sits in everyone's interface panel, and even then I don't know if the profanity filter actually affects the GMoTD.
Since you (perhaps wisely) didn't specify what the message actually read, it's difficult to judge the severity of the situation. A lot of guys who are otherwise mature adults sometimes joke around in a way that could be construed as homophobic, but typically no offense is meant. It can be good-natured smack talk, but it can also go too far and get truly offensive. Since another officer went to the trouble of contacting Blizzard about the message, I'll have to assume it's the latter.
Even though this person wasn't "caught," I'd say the officers should meet with one another and ask the offending party to step forward. Based on your e-mail, they may have already done so. However, it's entirely possible that none of the officers know who did it. If an officer's friend or roommate snuck onto the officer's machine while he or she was AFK, then that person could have changed the message with no one the wiser.
More important than who did it is how the officers respond to the situation. An apology should be made to the guild's membership. It should also be communicated that effort was taken to look into the matter, even if the results were inconclusive. If members were upset by the message, they need to know that the officers weren't passive or dismissive of the insult.
In the end, it's not necessarily a huge deal and shouldn't be made into one by extended periods of finger-pointing. Sometimes overreacting to a situation can be just as bad as not reacting at all.
/salute
Filed under: Officers' Quarters (Guild Leadership)






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Magma May 19th 2008 11:16AM
Considering the worst that could've happened is someone MIGHT have had their feelings hurt, lodging a complaint to blizzard for something one of their own GMs did was stupid.
Honestly, I think it it's a worse offense the guy actually went so far as to do a ticket. Adding to this, everyone should know that blizzard will NEVER name another player for doing anything because of privacy etc..
Timothy W May 19th 2008 11:25AM
Then that's blizzards problem. Naming the Character has nothing to do with Privacy, as far as I am concerned. However, they don't agree, and I'm not paying them enough to change their mind. And having someone's feelings hurt can be a very delicate balance in a guild. If more people worried about something so simple as "Hurting their feelings", then the world would be a much safer place.
Reddeth May 19th 2008 12:48PM
Actually, I would bet the purpose of the ticket was to see if Blizz could check a log or something to find out who made the change. I can't say that for sure, but that's what popped into my head as I read the OP.
xtole May 19th 2008 12:51PM
/sleep omg boring read!
Balgair May 19th 2008 11:17AM
I really can't understand why Blizz haven't added an option to keep logs on who changes guild MOTD or playernotes yet. My old main's guild ended up removing the rights for players to change their notes because people were editing other people's notes with offensive comments (well, suspicion was that it was one person but there was no proof).
It's hardly a privacy issue when it's just about changing of notes - we have logs of who invites/kicks members, we have logs of bank transactions, so why not also logs on notes changing?
Bromnir May 19th 2008 7:39PM
Or even better, how about an option to only allow people to change their OWN note? It seems so obvious, I am baffled as to why it hasn't been implemented by Blizz...
Steve May 19th 2008 11:22AM
Is this for real? Some people need to calm down and quit being offended over anything.
Naix May 19th 2008 12:12PM
So true. If someone gets their feelings hurt they need to grow up, brush it off, and move on.
Reddeth May 19th 2008 12:49PM
I'm not sure why this post was marked down. Perhaps someone is offended by the idea of not being offended?
Sean Riley May 19th 2008 7:32PM
Perhaps it would be better served if some people rather learned some manners? Then nobody would be offended.
"A bit of kindness, a bit of civility in a cold world. It's the most that you can hope for." -- Cassidy, Preacher. (Heavily paraphrased from memory.)
Dready May 19th 2008 8:18PM
People shouldn't need to accomodate for everyone in the way they conduct themselves. If we all did, we'd have very little to say.. Or just alot of awkward silences because we're too busy moderating what we're about to say in our heads before we speak it.
Shawn May 19th 2008 11:28AM
Getting ready for another load of comments about people being too easily offended and the evils of political correctness. If it wasn't so sad it would be laughable how people try to excuse discrimination, prejudice and racism by just bringing up the words "political correctness."
Reminds me of a certain president and "9/11."
Daniel Beckham May 19th 2008 3:11PM
> Getting ready for another load of comments about people
> being too easily offended and the evils of political
> correctness. If it wasn't so sad it would be laughable how
> people try to excuse discrimination, prejudice and racism by
> just bringing up the words "political correctness."
> Reminds me of a certain president and "9/11."
I'll bite. I'm assuming that you are responding to the comments on Adam Holsky's post about the "Rosa Parks Took My Seat" arena name?
If you want to argue about the problem of the oversensitive American culture, I'll be glad to debate with you why these pansies are turning our nation into a snotty nosed, sniveling group of people who's world is turned upside down any and every time anyone makes a comment they don't like. After years of this, it's beginning to border on the criminal. These people whine and moan until someone censors those who speak their mind.
You bring up Bush and 9/11 as an example of this, but the real censors in this culture, the real people who encroach on our freedom, the real people who can see nothing but skin color, sexual preference and males or females are the very people bitching and moaning about it anytime anyone they disagree happens to open their mouth.
I know it's an often used term, but it's pure Stalinism. Those you disagree with should be silenced. One way or another.
Shawn May 19th 2008 3:25PM
>I'll bite. I'm assuming that you are responding to the >comments on Adam Holsky's post about the "Rosa Parks >Took My Seat" arena name
No, actually I wasn't. I hadn't even read them before you replied to this post. And after reading them, I don't really think they are worth responding to.
JPN May 19th 2008 11:29AM
I'd reconsider if you NEED 10 people having that kind of access, anyway.
SimpleSurvival May 19th 2008 11:43AM
agreed right there
But, a Guild log would be useful too...
Who promoted/demoted/invited/kicked/changed notes would be a nice thing
its strange sometimes to see new people in high ranks that were never explained to you...
I always feel like i'm being invasive and aggressive to new people if i ask directly... would be nice to just check the log, see that your trusted friend added them to the guild and hopped em up a rank or two and invite the guy to party
---
For the complaints about being offended and suggestions for people to take it easy... sometimes it doesn't work that way. Its not your place to dictate what works for someone else. If a guild wants to promote a policy of PC and friendly, that is their call, and such activities are disruptive to their guild. Granted, they brought it upon themselves with such a big batch of potential suspects.
Cynra May 19th 2008 12:07PM
SimpleSurvival, one of the signs of a good guild is a list of requirements or traits of each rank within the guild and how to obtain them. This way, you don't have that kind of confusion when people get promoted.
For example, the guild that I used to manage before stepping down to focus on my real life had very simple ranks and rules. The first rank was for neophytes and people who were reprimanded. The next two or so ranks were level-based -- if you hit a certain level, you were automatically promoted (unless you join the guild within two weeks, in which case you were on probationary status and considered under review). The next rank was our Aide de Camps, who were people who had demonstrated knowledge of the game and were considered valuable resources (loremongers, theorycrafters, whatever). Then we had a "hero" rank of sort which were given to people who had done something outstanding that deserved merit. The final three ranks were for officers and they had to meet participation rules (mainly about being a member of the guild for some time and being available -- guild officers who are never around suck) and have the recommendation of an existing officer.
Furthermore, every promotion beyond the level-based ranks was announced on the forums and often in-game using either the Message of the Day or word-of-mouth.
Having a log would simplify that, but it shouldn't be a bandage for good communication!
Sylythn May 19th 2008 5:29PM
What amazes me - is that people read your MotD. Can't tell you the number of people who say they don't know what's going on because all their addon spam scrolls it off screen. Never mind you can hit 'o' at any time and read it - that takes too much effort. We've taken to having our officers "modify" it when they log in, just so it shows up for everybody online at that time.
Buckshot May 19th 2008 11:41AM
QQ more, just play the frackin' game.
I.P. Freely May 19th 2008 11:49AM
Your parents should've fracked less...