Officers' Quarters: Jerk message of the day

Every Monday Scott Andrews contributes Officers' Quarters, a column about the ins and outs of guild leadership.
I've spent the past six weeks talking about raiding, so I think it's time to get away from the topic and talk about something less drama-ridden, like the guild message of the day feature. What could be more straightforward and less controversial, right? Well, as this week's e-mail reminds us, no part of leading a guild is completely free of incident.
Would rather not name the guild but it's on Bronzebeard EU. Only the Guildmasters (of which there are 10) can set the message of the day. Despite this security, an offensive homophobic message of the day appeared one day. I'm afraid I didn't see it as I wasn't online while it was up, but when another Guildmaster saw it, it was immediately removed. No one owned up to it and no one could think who would do it, so one Guildmaster (a friend of mine in real life) logged a complaint with Blizzard to try and find out who set this message.
He spent a couple of weeks chasing an answer but in the end they said that who set the message was private account information that they would not give out to someone else (great cop out isn't it :) ). And there we are stuck! A couple of guildmasters left for more hardcore raiding guilds, so maybe, hopefully it was one of them . . . but I guess we'll never know. Can you think of anything that could be done to avoid this or controls to avoid this kind of offensive message?
The only way to avoid this situation is to make sure the people who have access to the GMoTD are trustworthy and responsible people. If your own officers prove that they aren't, then the guild leader can actually modify the permissions so that only he or she can change the message. But there is no built-in censorship to this feature aside from the one that sits in everyone's interface panel, and even then I don't know if the profanity filter actually affects the GMoTD.
Since you (perhaps wisely) didn't specify what the message actually read, it's difficult to judge the severity of the situation. A lot of guys who are otherwise mature adults sometimes joke around in a way that could be construed as homophobic, but typically no offense is meant. It can be good-natured smack talk, but it can also go too far and get truly offensive. Since another officer went to the trouble of contacting Blizzard about the message, I'll have to assume it's the latter.
Even though this person wasn't "caught," I'd say the officers should meet with one another and ask the offending party to step forward. Based on your e-mail, they may have already done so. However, it's entirely possible that none of the officers know who did it. If an officer's friend or roommate snuck onto the officer's machine while he or she was AFK, then that person could have changed the message with no one the wiser.
More important than who did it is how the officers respond to the situation. An apology should be made to the guild's membership. It should also be communicated that effort was taken to look into the matter, even if the results were inconclusive. If members were upset by the message, they need to know that the officers weren't passive or dismissive of the insult.
In the end, it's not necessarily a huge deal and shouldn't be made into one by extended periods of finger-pointing. Sometimes overreacting to a situation can be just as bad as not reacting at all.
/salute
Filed under: Officers' Quarters (Guild Leadership)
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 4 of 4)
Taxis May 19th 2008 2:10PM
Something very similar to that happened in the officers notes of one of my fellow officers half a year back. A ticket to blizz was also made, and they gave a similar response. In the end we never really figured out who it was, but it bread mistrust amongst the officers for months.
jmsalsa May 19th 2008 2:27PM
if blizzard had to "check to see who did it" every time there was a guild dispute, they'd never get anything accomplished.
it's unfortunate that this happened, but i don't see how it's blizzard's responsibility to help someone police their guild.
onetrueping May 19th 2008 5:09PM
To Naix:
On the one hand, I agree with you. If someone says something, and they didn't mean it to be offensive, then you should brush it off.
On the other hand, I disagree with you. If you said something, and someone was offended and said so, the correct response isn't "I didn't mean it, get over it," it's "I didn't mean it, and I apologize for unintentionally offending you."
Just because something isn't meant to be hurtful to someone, doesn't excuse you from apologizing for hurting them.
Sean Riley May 19th 2008 7:44PM
Well put. If you are offended, you are well within your rights to ask for an apology. Upon receiving a satisfactory one, then you should back down and accept it graciously.
It amazes me how many people online don't realise what a wonderful and useful thing good manners actually are.
Naix May 20th 2008 9:57AM
People need to stop apologizing so much. It really gets over used and looses it's meaning. I believe people are smart enough to understand if someone meant something.
We are turning into a society of babies our forefathers would be embarrassed of. I laugh when I think of all the generations who had to be tough as nails only to have their off spring a bunch of babies.
onetrueping May 20th 2008 8:17PM
Funny, since this is called "common courtesy," and if our "tough as nails" forefathers saw how we treat each other these days, without such courtesy, they would most likely be appalled. Still, if you are so crude as to say that common courtesy and other such forms of acceptable social behavior are stupid, it shows the measure of your moral character: severely lacking.
I think I will disregard your comments from now on, now that I know of your lack of moral fiber. Good day, sir.
Eternalpayn May 19th 2008 6:21PM
Anchorman == Best. Movie. Ever.
Delvin May 20th 2008 6:12AM
So when I'm done wringing my hands over someone else's anti-homosexual comments on some guild or other, should I then get all hot over the "Go fuck yourselves, San Diego" graphic that started out this article? That was pretty classy too.
Eternalpayn May 20th 2008 7:34AM
That was a reference to the movie Anchorman, where they change the teleprompter so that it says that as Ron Burgundy's sign-off line, he reads it, and gets fired. So, if you look at it that way, it is basically saying that offensive MoTD's should get you /gkicked.
Naix May 20th 2008 9:53AM
"Nizari said...
Naix: It's one thing for you to use empty dittoheadisms, feeble-minded ad hominem attacks, and overusing your PC card so much that it's on the verge of disintegrating into dust. But if you're going to play with the big boys and actually attempt to use empirical evidence, you better be able to back it up. I want to know who did the study, what their credentials are, what sample size they used, how many sample were tested, what alpha size they used and what P value they got. Simply saying "oh, I heard of a study once" does not constitute hard evidence. "
Nizari
First you need to use REAL words when trying to insult me. Dittoheadism is NOT a real word and does not exist in the English dictionary. So please don't try and sound so smart with your made up words. Use the Internet to look the study up. Google is a great tool everyone, even you, can use.
Fugmug May 20th 2008 10:42AM
You forgot to mention the hypocrisy in deploying the words "feeble-minded" in the same sentence that they were complaining about ad-hominem.
But like any hysterical, soap-opera follower of nonsense who thinks Blizzard is bad for not participating in a soft-skin witch-hunt, you have to do as they say, not as they do.
(oh noes.... I've used ad-hominem against a zealot's self-invented morality in my run-on sentence!)
Fug
ThorinII May 20th 2008 10:38AM
I admit I didn't read every post here, so if I repeat something someone else said, please forgive me.
1. Why is a statement that makes a derogatory remark about homosexuality considered “homophobic?” Doesn’t that mean you’re afraid of homosexuality? Most of the time those making such remarks are against it and/or don’t understand it, but that doesn’t mean they’re afraid of it. Shouldn’t we use “anti” rather than “phobic?” Just something I’ve always wondered about. I don’t need everyone replying to explain it. It’s food for thought, not discussion.
2. How the heck is the name of a toon “private” information? They run around Azeroth and (possibly) Outland for all the world to see their toon name. If that were private info everyone would have to go around asking each player their name, it wouldn’t be listed above their heads.
3. Something I find it completely perplexing is when someone cries, “What you say offends me! I have the right to think and say whatever I want! Now you shut-up!” Don’t those saying the things that you don’t agree with or are against your beliefs allowed to think and say what they want? That said; I see nothing wrong with everyone practicing a simple thing that most of our mothers tried to teach us as children… “If you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.”
4. What did they say? :0P
Aeo May 20th 2008 11:23AM
What really gets me about the whole "being scared/against the idea of homosexuality because I don’t understand it" deal, is that yes...there are people out there that are afraid of what they don’t understand...but on the flip side of that, the ones being scared usually are worried someone is looking at them or going to hit on them. News...not every gay guy finds you attractive, like some people seem to perceive is true. That thinking suggests to me a type of ignorant, self centered attitude, to honestly think all guys find you hot.
There is nothing more irritating than to have someone get bent out of shape because they cant have a normal conversation because they think you have some ulterior motive...and then you have to embarrass them when you tell them you are not attracted to them and then it becomes a case of them thinking "WTF you mean I’m not hot enough for you now, what’s wrong with you! You should be attracted to me so I can tell you not to hit on me!"
Yea...nothing like having the mindset that the world revolves around you and everyone should have the privileged of being turned down by you.
But more on topic, yea…a little bit of common sense and courtesy goes a long way.
To bad you can’t loot common sense.
Aeo May 20th 2008 11:25AM
Privilege*
Curse you non-existant edit button!
Zor May 20th 2008 5:27PM
Naix
i dont think there are many as old as you and i
those that cant remember history - or even take it !!
you know whats funny?
life was alot more plesant and 'nice' in the 70's
when 'ahem' racism was supposed to be at an all time high
nowdays - it seems racism and intollerance are at an all time high?
bring back racism in the truest form, bring back Archie Bunker?
might work
anyone under 30, dont bother - like a university student asking a question - no elementaries need reply
this is for us old farts heh ;)
john May 20th 2008 7:42PM
Yeah...
L.A riots and lynchings will attest to that!
moron...