Blizzard: Sharing Wrath data is "extremely offensive and inappropriate"
As if there was any doubt, Nethaera has posted that Blizzard considers the sharing of any Wrath of the Lich King alpha information "extremely offensive and inappropriate," though it's a good question as to whom that is, other than Blizzard themselves. Here at WoW Insider, our policy is not to rehost or quote any leaked alpha information, though as a service to our readers, we've been linking to other sites where it may be found. But is it within Blizzard's rights to lash out at anyone who does host or discuss leaked alpha information?As copyright holders, they certainly have ownership of any notes, updates, or models released, so it could be considered a violation of copyright law to rehost the information. But to really get to the center of the problems behind this leak, you have to realize where it likely came from: the Friends and Family Alpha release. A little while ago, Blizzard distributed the client for Wrath to a number of their "friends and family" -- probably a group that consisted of employees and their WoW-playing relatives, as well as likely some folks at Vivendi and Activision, other Blizzard partners like Upper Deck and Figureprints, and probably a number of high-end raiding guilds who've done a lot of pre-beta testing for Blizzard before. Somewhere in there was someone not quite as trustworthy as Blizzard thought (odds are that Blizzard at the very least collected a signed non-disclosure agreement from everyone that they sent the client to), and that person uploaded or otherwise shared the client, against the agreement.
Cut to a few days later, after that person shares it with another person, who shares it with one more person, who then uploads it to a popular bittorrent filesharing site, and suddenly everyone's got access to everything in the Wrath client, and even if they can't play it, they can still datamine and grab information.
The Pandora's box has been opened, and even if Blizzard contacts YouTube to remove various kinds of media, and files injunctions against every single wiki and blog out there that does post the information, that box can't be closed again. There are a number of reasons Blizzard wouldn't want this information getting out -- first and foremost, it's just not done yet, so even talents and abilities that are listed as working in the alpha may be changed, reverted, or even completely removed in the final client. Second, releasing this much Wrath information at once hurts Blizzard's ability to control their player base's expectations and keep them interested in the expansion (we saw this at BlizzCon last year -- Frank Pearce was pretty unhappy that his keynote had been leaked before he got a chance to actually give it, because things he expected to be surprises actually weren't). So there are quite a few reasons why Blizzard wouldn't want this information out there.
From this side of the fence, Blizzard's feeling that the leaks are "offensive and inappropriate" isn't quite justified -- if anything, this news has gotten players even more interested in the expansion, and the information that has leaked seems just outlandish enough that no one is giving it too much heed. Even if the talent notes said that Druids were getting an octopus on a motorcycle form, that information would inspire much more player fervor if it was announced by Drysc on the forums rather than leaked out on a wiki.
In the end, the biggest result of this may just be for Blizzard to hold their cards closer to their chest for longer -- most developers realize by now that what used to be an "open beta" for MMOs is really a playable demo, and that you can't really let anyone download anything unless you want it to show up elsewhere on the internet. And "Friends and Family alphas," at Blizzard, will probably become a thing of the past -- while they'll still need playtesting done, it'll be by inviting people to their headquarters, not by sending out clients for download or through the mail.
As for sites covering Blizzard (this site, WoW Radio, MMO-Champion, World of Raids, and others), these leaks aren't coming from them at all. When asked by Blizzard to remove information, we did so, and many other media outlets around the WoW community have made the same decision we have: to not host Wrath information. There is a concern by some of these outlets that posting the information would cause problems with Blizzard regarding official access to coverage of events like BlizzCon and the WorldWide Invitational, but just like Neth's "offensive" comment, any action Blizzard takes against these sites is misdirected -- the leaks are the result of the people who signed the NDA and received (and then shared) the alpha client, directly against any agreement they made.
This will all be moot in a few months, of course -- eventually, we'll all hear plenty about Wrath and all the talents and abilities that will be open to us in the expansion. Whether you visit the leak sites or not, you'll know what's in the expansion even before you make it to 71. But until then, the only thing really "offensive and inappropriate" about this whole situation is Blizzard's attempts to re-hide what they sent out into the public in the first place. If they're looking to blame someone for sharing pre-release information or messing up their marketing plan, they should look to the Friends and Family they shared the alpha with.
Filed under: Patches, Analysis / Opinion, Blizzard, Expansions
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 2 of 5)
Bylak May 22nd 2008 8:05PM
Honestly, Blizzard was able to keep SC2 a complete secret for a good 10 YEARS. I wouldn't be surprised if they had something to do with this leak themselves.
Verit May 22nd 2008 8:08PM
WoW Insiders constant commenting on it is spoiling the whole expansion for anyone that likes surprises. Not that I don't blame them - I'm sure most readers are eating this stuff up.
Also it really is in bad taste to disclose trade secrets especially when you have signed an NDA. The company who does the beta really does loose goodwill with beta customers doing beta's like this in the future.
Alchemistmerlin May 22nd 2008 10:55PM
If people don't like spoilers about class developments (And that's kinda sad really...) then they probably shouldn't be reading a news blog about the game they're afraid of being spoiled.
This just in: Lady Prestor is Onyxia!
Heilig May 22nd 2008 8:08PM
"that person uploaded or otherwise shared the client, against the agreement."
Don't be too sure about that. The very first links I saw for the client downlaoder were at a worldofwarcraft.com domain name. They were official (if invisible) links. Someone could very easily have accessed those just by being industirous and knowing the alpha was taking place. No one necessarily had to have "leaked" any of this.
Phemur May 22nd 2008 8:12PM
"any action Blizzard takes against these sites is misdirected"
I disagree. While these sites may not be the ones who actually leaked the information, they are disseminating it. And because these sites reach a much broader audience, they could actually be doing just as much harm.
We may all think that Blizzard is over-reacting, but let's see things from their perspective. They've been working hard on this expansion, and they are/were excited to make a big show out of the announcement. Now their big moment is ruined by people who were trusted by Blizzard, enough to help them polish their latest creation. They feel betrayed, understandably so.
The morons who did this aren't just hurting Blizzard, they're also hurting all of the folks who are taking part in the alpha. And probably future alphas, since Blizzard is likely to be rethinking this policy.
Dave May 22nd 2008 8:16PM
nobody is hurt by anything at all, don't be delusional.
grand dog and pony shows are a thing of the past and have been for quite a while. If anything, the smart company takes advantage of free publicity and saves the money they'd have otherwise spent on paid promotion.
Why do work when you can just leak something and let everyone else do it for you?
Zarzuur May 22nd 2008 8:14PM
Legalese < Common sense
It's like Apple who have a terms of service for just _browsing_ their website.
Nick May 22nd 2008 8:17PM
I did not sign no damn NDA, what you talkin bout willis?!?! o.O
Dave May 22nd 2008 8:15PM
For a company that's based around technology involving the internet, Blizzard seems to remain very, very clueless about how the world has changed.
The only way to control anything anymore, is to actually release the information when it's available. Special nonsense like a trickle of information carefully timed to be at an event only works if absolutely nobody outside the actual project knows about what's going on. Even then, you have to keep everyone on the project happy or scared of losing their job if any information gets out. Hollywood has taken to personalizing and watermarking scripts and test prints and everything on the movie chain, as well as straight up shooting fake scenes with fake dialogue and all sorts of stuff because most Hollywood people have actually realized that the internet changed everything and removed any control they had over anything at all.
Music labels, they're barely figuring out that if you have music and it's in a ready-to-sell form, there's no logic behind waiting for a magical calendar date to put it in a store, the quicker you make it available, the less time between the leak and the sale.
I personally think that some of the info came from Blizzard and is only halfheartedly being pulled back. Surely they can't think that anything they do once any info is out actually matters, because if anyone's been paying attention over the last few years (HD-DVD?) once it's out, the game is over. You've lost, stop whining. Coincidentally (or not!) most of this alpha stuff started leaking in advance of the actual start of the alpha... but the day BEFORE a new competitor came out. Would you quit WoW and bail for AoC knowing some of the things that "leaked" or would you say "wow that's just want I wanted out of WoW!" and stick around instead?
Who has the most to gain by getting existing subscribers really jazzed about an expansion by releasing some of the more awesome bits right before a new game? Blizzard of course. Then as a manner of procedure, as to not make it all look like an intentional way to stem anyone from leaving their game, they have to crack down on sites. Then when the beta starts they'll have "given up" and it'll all be fair game. Just watch. It may also happen to be the same week that Warhammer finally launches, but we'll see.
It's pointless to try to stop something once it's out. Everyone with any intelligence should know that. It's not pointless however, to use potential leaked information to your own advantage, which in this case i definitely think they did.
Verit May 23rd 2008 4:08AM
If Blizzard were a public company there could be serious implications for leaking announce dates and new features as it could lead to speculation on their stock.
I'm in the Alpha - I read the terms they make you accept - anyone leaking this information has violated these terms.
Daimon May 23rd 2008 11:03AM
I agree with you, but it is not entirely imposible to remove videos from the web. it has been done before (rich ppl porn videos?) sure they are ilegal sites with some mirros but the massive media sites wich many ppl visits can be contained.
Is it viable to do it from blizzrd in this case? No, Is it stupid? yes.
c'mon.. I bet this was a tactical move, there is A LOT of ppl with renewed interest in the game, with 2 major mmorpg out and incoming. And I also bet this "i'm soo offended" new policy is a cover of "fuck yeah, we did it again!!"
Fobok May 22nd 2008 8:21PM
Actually, I can see why Blizzard would find it offensive, at least those who worked on the content. It's ruining the surprise, which can be incredibly fun. It's the same kind of thing as when J.K. Rowling got upset at people posting spoilers for the final Harry Potter book before it was released.And why some film companies keep scripts so tightly under wraps that sometimes even the actors don't know what's going to happen outside the scenes they're in.
Leaks hurt business (though in this case I doubt by very much) and remove creative control.
Seamus May 22nd 2008 8:30PM
And of course, Wowinsider is desperately trying to justify its role in sharing this information. "We're not hosting it, we're only providing a link to another site" is pretty thin, imo.
Ever hear of a "media blackout"? Why can't we just wait until Blizzard is ready to release info? I'd rather be (pleasantly) surprised.
wyrd May 23rd 2008 11:52AM
Heres an idea, if you dont want to know, dont read the article. All the articles are clearly marked as to what they are about. No on is forcing you to read about the talents that probably wont go live anyways.
Phemur May 22nd 2008 9:09PM
"grand dog and pony shows are a thing of the past and have been for quite a while."
Absolutely not. Many companies still do huge shows to present new products or services. Take the Cannes film festival for example. Many large movie studios still wait for that weekend to release their movies because of all the hype that's built around it. Blizzard waited until Blizzcon to make the Starcraft 2 announcement, Apple puts on huge shows for their product releases, etc, etc.
I could go on for a while, but you get the idea.
Eternalpayn May 22nd 2008 8:42PM
The client was hosted on worldofwarcraft.com
The new client is also being hosted on worldofwarcraft.com (although it's possible banhammer bait)
Blizzard did this themselves...
soul May 22nd 2008 8:43PM
It looks to me that you guys are trying to convince everyone that it's ok for you to link the stuff Blizzard doesn't want to be available on the net at this point. Blizz said multiple times that they did not intend and do not want alpha info to be released to the public.
Yes, you pulled everything off your site, but you still keep linking to it and discussing. And being in an official WoW fan site program (as far as I understand), it doesn't really earn much respect for you guys. At least for some of us.
It's like a child who tries to excuse his misbehavior by saying "You told me to do this, but you never told me to NOT do that." And with all due respect, but who are you to decide what is what is not offensive to Blizzard as creators of the game. They are the ones working on and putting all that time in. It could be different reasons which all have been mentioned already: competing market, experimenting with stuff without having to deal with cries "where is my uber skill?! it was in alpha" later on, or whatever else. The point is - they do not want this info to be available. By discussing it on your site, you're basically opening it up for a whole lot of people due to how popular your blog is.
I understand you need all those clicks and visits and probably fear that if you don't discuss it, people will just start going to competing sites. But please don't speak about professionalism here. IMO it would be professional to say something along "Yes, the info is out there and has been liked. But since we're a WoW fan site, and the one which Blizzard appreciates and is willing to work with, we will not post any info or links on this." Now that would be a great way to deal with the situation from my point of view.
Mike Schramm May 22nd 2008 8:46PM
Just for the record, we're not in an official WoW fansite program -- we are a completely unofficial WoW site.
Publio May 22nd 2008 8:48PM
"Now that would be a great way to deal with the situation from my point of view."
you mean like spooncraft.com?
soul May 22nd 2008 8:49PM
And I just wanted to add that I really appreciate all the work you do, otherwise I wouldn't spend time writing all of this. I just don't think you guys are right in this situation. And trying to justify it with such excuses as "we just post links" is just looking silly. You either cooperate with Blizzard and respect their will to keep this info private, or you don't. It looks like it is the latter in this case which is fine with me. Just the way you're presenting it... Well, not that professional really.