Blizzard: Sharing Wrath data is "extremely offensive and inappropriate"
As if there was any doubt, Nethaera has posted that Blizzard considers the sharing of any Wrath of the Lich King alpha information "extremely offensive and inappropriate," though it's a good question as to whom that is, other than Blizzard themselves. Here at WoW Insider, our policy is not to rehost or quote any leaked alpha information, though as a service to our readers, we've been linking to other sites where it may be found. But is it within Blizzard's rights to lash out at anyone who does host or discuss leaked alpha information?As copyright holders, they certainly have ownership of any notes, updates, or models released, so it could be considered a violation of copyright law to rehost the information. But to really get to the center of the problems behind this leak, you have to realize where it likely came from: the Friends and Family Alpha release. A little while ago, Blizzard distributed the client for Wrath to a number of their "friends and family" -- probably a group that consisted of employees and their WoW-playing relatives, as well as likely some folks at Vivendi and Activision, other Blizzard partners like Upper Deck and Figureprints, and probably a number of high-end raiding guilds who've done a lot of pre-beta testing for Blizzard before. Somewhere in there was someone not quite as trustworthy as Blizzard thought (odds are that Blizzard at the very least collected a signed non-disclosure agreement from everyone that they sent the client to), and that person uploaded or otherwise shared the client, against the agreement.
Cut to a few days later, after that person shares it with another person, who shares it with one more person, who then uploads it to a popular bittorrent filesharing site, and suddenly everyone's got access to everything in the Wrath client, and even if they can't play it, they can still datamine and grab information.
The Pandora's box has been opened, and even if Blizzard contacts YouTube to remove various kinds of media, and files injunctions against every single wiki and blog out there that does post the information, that box can't be closed again. There are a number of reasons Blizzard wouldn't want this information getting out -- first and foremost, it's just not done yet, so even talents and abilities that are listed as working in the alpha may be changed, reverted, or even completely removed in the final client. Second, releasing this much Wrath information at once hurts Blizzard's ability to control their player base's expectations and keep them interested in the expansion (we saw this at BlizzCon last year -- Frank Pearce was pretty unhappy that his keynote had been leaked before he got a chance to actually give it, because things he expected to be surprises actually weren't). So there are quite a few reasons why Blizzard wouldn't want this information out there.
From this side of the fence, Blizzard's feeling that the leaks are "offensive and inappropriate" isn't quite justified -- if anything, this news has gotten players even more interested in the expansion, and the information that has leaked seems just outlandish enough that no one is giving it too much heed. Even if the talent notes said that Druids were getting an octopus on a motorcycle form, that information would inspire much more player fervor if it was announced by Drysc on the forums rather than leaked out on a wiki.
In the end, the biggest result of this may just be for Blizzard to hold their cards closer to their chest for longer -- most developers realize by now that what used to be an "open beta" for MMOs is really a playable demo, and that you can't really let anyone download anything unless you want it to show up elsewhere on the internet. And "Friends and Family alphas," at Blizzard, will probably become a thing of the past -- while they'll still need playtesting done, it'll be by inviting people to their headquarters, not by sending out clients for download or through the mail.
As for sites covering Blizzard (this site, WoW Radio, MMO-Champion, World of Raids, and others), these leaks aren't coming from them at all. When asked by Blizzard to remove information, we did so, and many other media outlets around the WoW community have made the same decision we have: to not host Wrath information. There is a concern by some of these outlets that posting the information would cause problems with Blizzard regarding official access to coverage of events like BlizzCon and the WorldWide Invitational, but just like Neth's "offensive" comment, any action Blizzard takes against these sites is misdirected -- the leaks are the result of the people who signed the NDA and received (and then shared) the alpha client, directly against any agreement they made.
This will all be moot in a few months, of course -- eventually, we'll all hear plenty about Wrath and all the talents and abilities that will be open to us in the expansion. Whether you visit the leak sites or not, you'll know what's in the expansion even before you make it to 71. But until then, the only thing really "offensive and inappropriate" about this whole situation is Blizzard's attempts to re-hide what they sent out into the public in the first place. If they're looking to blame someone for sharing pre-release information or messing up their marketing plan, they should look to the Friends and Family they shared the alpha with.
Filed under: Patches, Analysis / Opinion, Blizzard, Expansions
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news





Reader Comments (Page 3 of 5)
Aranon May 22nd 2008 8:49PM
I understand the journalistic drive to report Alpha information. While I think it ultimately harms the playerbase by really mucking with expectations and requiring Blizzard to develop content and test content with perceptions in mind instead of with actual balance in mind, I guess I don't fault the "reporting agencies" commenting on it - even if they're fueling the problem dramatically.
The people I fault are those who have been invited to the Friends and Family Alpha who are leaking that information. That, I think, is the most offensive thing. You've been invited to participate in something private to better the game you enjoy. Instead of testing it and bug-reporting, you're sharing that information and, as mentioned above, ultimately harming the game and the playerbase. Not only that, you're helping to ensure that these kinds of Alpha opportunities will vanish in the future.
But to call Blizzard's frustration over the leaks offensive is downright absurd. Let's say you and I are friends, Mike, and I invite you in to something private and tell you a very personal secret. A secret that could compromise my future and my relationships with others. Then you go around telling people about it. When confronted, you blame me for telling you in the first place. I, apparently, am to blame for putting it out there.
The real scenario is even more absurd. Whereas I might be fine without my secret being told, WotLK will not be fine without extensive player testing. Blizzard must allow people in to test. They needn't tolerate leaks just because they let people in on the secret.
soul May 22nd 2008 8:54PM
"Just for the record, we're not in an official WoW fansite program -- we are a completely unofficial WoW site."
Thanks for correcting me on this one, Mike. Wasn't really sure there. But my point still stands.
"you mean like spooncraft.com?"
This is the first time I hear about them, so can't really answer your question =)
Shadowisp May 22nd 2008 8:57PM
A bit rude for Blizz to be crying to us...
its their "Friend and Family" that started the leaks.
Thorgrim May 22nd 2008 9:07PM
People - *there very likely was no leak*. The clients were downloadable for anyone who could figure out the path to download them. Via HTTP. *From Blizzard*.
The path was something completely obvious like www.worldofwarcraft.com/wotlk/beta/ too. It was a screw up on Blizzard's part, and the best/worst part of it, is they will either have to put out entirely new clients for their testers, or be resigned to all their future patches being datamined as well, because the people who got those clients downloaded will be able to patch them.
Iwanttobeasleep May 22nd 2008 9:28PM
I really don't see where everyone is getting the idea that this is an overreaction. They posted a small post on a thread, threatened to ban, not from the game, just the forums, anyone who partakes in the discussion, and they requested sites take down the information. It wasn't in a press release, and the only value judgment was that it was "extremely offensive and inappropriate". That does strike me, also, as very silly, but with the exception of that everything has been completely sane, rational, and reasonable.
The information got me nothing but excited for the game, and everything I've seen was completely positive, but it could have easily gone the other way. The game is in alpha, if it was leaked that there were bad things about it, that it didn't run well, was glitchy, had features that were crap, which would be completely reasonable for a game in alpha, it could harm future sales.
ghostbear May 22nd 2008 9:30PM
I've had to deal with the press in my RL job for a corp and if we dealt with the press they way Blizz does, it would be a disaster. This kind of retaliation against sites that do nothing but generate more interest in their product is puerile.
Telling a site they won't get access to BlizzCon if they post this alpha news is tantamount to blackmail. I want to know who at Blizz put this policy in place. To ask to pull it is one thing, to say "pull it or else" is another.
This info only keeps the "buzz" going during a time when nothing much is going to be happening in WoW for a number of months. Plus we all know this info will change before it goes gold. It's win/win for Blizz, they get people talking about their product and they aren't going to be held to that info.
Sorry to go on about this but I see your site do nothing but good for WoW and that they threaten your site and others is just very galling to me.
Den May 22nd 2008 9:57PM
But holding the info back makes people want it more
deviationer May 22nd 2008 9:30PM
waaaaaaaaaaa cry more blizzard
not like people aren't going to know when the closed beta starts
Most of us just want to know whats coming (earlier than you'd like for us to know) even if most of it's going to change before retail.
it's not like we are not going to by wrath
also, it's not our fault you guys didn't think to do a private torrent or some other private and secure way of locking up the alpha client.
Andy May 22nd 2008 9:48PM
I think Blizz wanted a small leak of information as kind of a teaser and partially to draw some of the attention away from Age of Conan. And even that's not the case, Blizz took the elevated risk by allowing "friends" & family to test the game.
Regardless, they will be getting some additional feedback pertaining to Wrath, whether if they wanted it or not!
Bylak May 22nd 2008 9:52PM
Also, if anything this has just made me want to start playing a Death Knight MORE ^_^
Den May 22nd 2008 9:54PM
Personally I think they are putting out a company line to make it seem feel a little more special for people when they get to see the info.
Look at the timing of the Wrath leaks, the client uploads and what not - Right in the middle of the AoC release, omg! I already know people that started playing AoC and are now back to talking about WoW(Wrath)
Blizzard are probably leaking this info themself (likely the people in Advertising) to distract people from AoC and it is working to some extent. The timing is just too perfect imo.
Leviathon May 22nd 2008 10:07PM
A person in the F&F Alpha did not give links the download was on Blizzards site in a easy to find link and it was downloaded from there. No one in the F&F Alpha gave us the client.
Kyrra May 23rd 2008 12:43AM
+Vote from me.
If you follow the information that's been going around, people found that beta.worldofwarcraft came online, then they started poking around until they found the Blizzard downloader. After which they downloaded the client and started taking it apart.
I have seen a few screenshots from F&F (at least they looked like they were from the real servers), but a majority of the leaks came from people tearing apart the client data. The first information to start coming out was extracted from a patch file (as people didn't get their hands on the full client yet). Then a day or 2 later people found the full client and were able to go to town.
Verit May 23rd 2008 4:12AM
Talent info definitely came from beta testers though - since that information is controlled completely from the server.
Badger May 23rd 2008 12:20PM
Wow. Just ... Wow.
If Blizzard was actually dumb enough to top secret game data in a blatantly obvious place, then bitch when people discovered it ...
You guys, this is not sarcasm when I say that you have completely turned my thinking around on this. Thanks Levi and Kyrra.
PJ May 22nd 2008 10:22PM
The torrent dowloader (like the normal patches) is available from blizzards site to anyone who knows the URL - its possible nobody leaked anything, but that dedicated fanboys figure out the URL address.
Tamzin May 22nd 2008 10:34PM
I'm afraid it's even worse and ironic and negligent than your article realises! The way people first got hold of the files to then data-mine them was from the WoW website itself, you just download the clients stiraight right off of them from there! You just need to figure out or know the url. The warped thing is this is EXACTLY the same mistake they made last time with TBC beta! HOW can they not learn from this mistake and do the exactly same thing again this time, making the exactly same mistake AGAIN is gob-smacking! Especially as they then throw legal action at others instead of admitted their own mistake. D'oh!
Anaughtybear May 22nd 2008 11:02PM
Blizzard should stop crying like kids with skinned knees and finish the expansion they announced oh so long ago. If they knew what they were doing and worked efficiently, or kept it under wraps, nobody would be having any difficulty right now. The problem Blizzard has is typical of companies like this, they don't know how to run a business and stay close to their fans. That and their developers are actually chimpanzees experimenting by banging a keypad until the expansion is finished. I was always confused as to why they announced Wrath of the Lich King so long ago, when they had absolutely nothing done on it. It was just empty promises back then, to keep people paying them and not switch to another game in the meantime. The whole thing just looks rather amateur.
Procris May 22nd 2008 11:36PM
Well i totally agree if Blizzard are against the leaks they need to look at tightening their control over the Alpha players. They are the source after all. Nothing is going to change the fact that all this stuff is leaked. However Bliz can prevent future leaks.
inexodus May 22nd 2008 11:39PM
"Here at WoW Insider, our policy is not to rehost or quote any leaked alpha information..."
I just have to say that this is a pretty thin argument when your posts have a prominent link to the wiki and essentially just reword the spell and talent information. Sure, you're not quoting the text exactly (though I didn't read every post to verify this), but is it really any different to describe each new class spell or talent using the same values given in the leaks?
Just one example from the warrior article:
"Shockwave... damage based on attack power, a cone AoE that hits all targets in front of the warrior for 10 yards, stunning for four seconds and causing high threat"
...and the wiki text:
"Shockwave - Sends a wave of force in front of the warrior, causing ${$m3/100*$AP} damage (based on attack power) and stunning all enemy targets within 10 yards in a frontal cone for 4 sec. This ability causes a high amount of threat."
It seems to me like you're obeying Blizzard's request only literally, and it certainly hasn't stopped this site from distributing the information. Then again I'm not a lawyer... maybe that's exactly what you have to do in order to not get sued.