WotLK Wiki is back in action
Don't count the WotLK Wiki out yet -- after going down late last week due to a suspected cease-and-desist order from Blizzard's lawyers (now confirmed), they have returned with a completely different host and all the information from the leaked Alpha they were originally hosting. They say that their original wiki hosts, Wikidot, were extremely supportive on both the traffic and legal fronts, as they upgraded their servers just to keep the site up, and originally did help with legal troubles. When Vivendi Universal took legal action against their ISP, however, Wikidot had to fold, and the wiki has now moved hosts to wotlkwiki.info.Last week, there was also mention that the C&D didn't ask them to remove all information, only "over-the-line" info, such as screenshots or video. But apparently that clause doesn't apply to the new host -- there are still screenshots all over the site, and though Vivendi has pulled video from YouTube before, it's still there as well.
Of course, any C&D sent to the old site would still apply to the new one -- it's just a question now of whether the wiki's new host will comply with Vivendi's demands (the wiki's creators sound very sure that they won't). And after that, it'll be up to Vivendi to determine how far they want to take this -- if they really feel that having this leaked information on that site has hurt them in a justifable way, there is a possibility that an actual lawsuit could be issued, and if this escalates even further, the two parties could eventually end up in court. As always, we'll be watching to see what happenes.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Odds and ends, Blizzard, Classes, Talents, Wrath of the Lich King






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
chaud Jun 23rd 2008 11:43AM
You guys are killing our server.
load average: 10.03
=(
Site will be slow until people calm down, more information / screenshots will likely be coming this week.
Darkside Jun 23rd 2008 11:52AM
Please, think of the server before you click.
Dan Jun 23rd 2008 11:48AM
Or you could honour the NDA that everyone in the alpha accepted and remove the info...
skajake Jun 23rd 2008 12:09PM
Why on earth would WoW Insider honor an NDA that they never signed or agreed to?
grofer Jun 23rd 2008 11:55AM
Wowinsider should pitch in on the costs to keep wotlkwiki up and running seeing how you get quite a lot of news from there
faradhim Jun 23rd 2008 12:10PM
Suing your customer. Didn't the music industry already try that? And if the memory serves they had a lot of success at that.
Verit Jun 23rd 2008 3:29PM
I think keyword here is customer - Blizzard probably doesn't care if the guys who run wotlk wiki quit playing because they lost a lawsuit and I don't care either because frankly someone playing the alpha decided to betray Blizzards trust.
deviationer Jun 23rd 2008 12:31PM
can't stop the signal...
peaglemancer Jun 23rd 2008 1:03PM
http://www.wikidot.com/ didn't fold?
jlpknights82 Jun 23rd 2008 2:15PM
The Wiki lives!
Tenchan Jun 23rd 2008 2:22PM
Hope they are proud of themselves. It's a true sign of a fan to go "Fuck you and your rules" at the company that made the game.
Theadrick Jun 23rd 2008 2:35PM
I agree with #6. Spot on.
Alchemistmerlin Jun 23rd 2008 2:41PM
A) Booooo
B) Keep linking to them, the more it costs them the better.
Kryptonls Jun 23rd 2008 7:01PM
Seriously, if WoW Insider were asked to remove all their WotLK stuff from some legal notice from Blizzard - then why the hell do you continue to promote others that are doing it?
Badger Jun 24th 2008 12:05AM
If Blizzard asked directly for the content to be removed, I would say:
'I understand, guys. I'll pull the content. You stick to making awesome games.'
If Blizzard's so-called 'parent company,' Vivendi Universal, asked directly for the content to be removed, I would say:
'Sure, sure, no problem. Hey, just one question, guys ... Have you heard about this company, Valve? They've apparently got this really neat thing called Steam, and it's really useful and easy to use, but there's this little thing in their legal history ... Interesting. They're saying they had to design it because ... Oh, wait, this is fascinating ... Apparently you ripped them off for millions of dollars by distributing thousands of copies of their games without giving them the percentage guaranteed in their agreement with you. Oh, wow, even better: What is this about you dragging them into a protracted legal battle claiming that their original IP rights were actually yours? Do you know anything about this? ... Guys? Where are you going?'
Vivendi are a bunch of fucking bullies.
ChaosHaven Jun 29th 2008 9:24AM
Do I hear an "owned" there? >=)
ChaosHaven Jul 3rd 2008 6:53PM
(meant that as supportive comment for Badger)