Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-03-2008 @ 3:40PM
Gulbrandt said...
It could also be that Blizzard has heard the call, and perhaps this could give hunters a chance to have their pet hold more aggro than the current pre-stated amount.
If it means losing a little DPS to having a pet that was more certain than ever to hold aggro while questing/grinding, sure, I'd go for it. I don't mind if fights take just a little longer.
I'm not certain if I'm phrasing this right, but one thing I notice is that hunters' feelings on what their pets should and shouldn't do is all over the road. The pet talent tree is a great way for a hunter to decide exactly how they'd like their pet to act. I think it's awesome. :)