WWI '08 Panel Analysis: PvP part I, Lake Wintergrasp

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

6-29-2008 @ 3:41PM

Procris said...

I have characters on both PvP and PvE realms and on my PvE realm, world pvp is non-existent. Alliance capture the towers all the time because not only is there a slight faction imbalance but the horde just generally never partake in world pvp anyway. The interest for them has never been there. Halaa is forever alliance controlled and so on and so forth. World pvp on my PvE server is a waste of time.

The faction imbalance on my horde PvP server is even worse in favour of the Alliance. Honestly, lake winterspring is going to be massive fail if alliance out number horde 5-1. There just won't be any point to going there.

6-29-2008 @ 4:02PM

Mullinator said...

Thats why they are implementing some system so that whichever faction fails to suceed in capturing the keep will have an easier time doing it next time. Supposedly whatever buff the loser gets will stack as well so if you lose twice in a row you are getting that buff stacked on itself.

Besides if it ends up being a problem I would bet money that Blizzard won't just abandon it like they did with other PvP objectives. Current instanced BG's have been evolving for years and are likely still not completed. Wintergrasp will likely be seeing the same kind of development over time.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.