Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-30-2008 @ 11:15AM
Wulf said...
I think Blizz might actually mean it when they say they dont want specific trees to necessarily have certain roles. Its looking like Frost has a lot of CC, whereas Blood has more in the way of damage mitigation and self-healing. It could be that both will be perfectly viable methods of tanking. Do you want to tank by being rock-hard, or tank by keeping all the mobs under control? I like it if this is the case!
Reply
6-30-2008 @ 1:41PM
Friday_Knight said...
If this is indeed the direction that Blizz is trying to take tanking I have only two words:
UNRELENTING JOY
6-30-2008 @ 2:00PM
dan said...
This is only applicable for DKs. Warr and druid trees very much have specific roles in mind. The trick here is that virtually any DK tree has tanking talents in it which means you'll never be able to dodge tanking with a DK.