Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-11-2008 @ 5:23AM
dw said...
I do love reading warrior QQs. They seem so much more epic; a class that has had it all for so long feels threatened because others can now do something almost as well.
A raid should only need one warrior tank. As it should only need one pala, one bear and when they come along, one DK. Each different, each serving a purpose. All should be capable of maintanking, but the encounters should be tuned to make one class more viable on an encounter by encounter basis. Warriors need to stop QQing and accept the fact that this game has many tanking classes and that the only reason they were the defacto tanking class pre-TBC is because Blizz left palas and bears to rot. They fixed a lot of the problems in TBC, and here we are, much better off because of it.
Reply