Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-12-2008 @ 7:15PM
luds said...
Hi, as a warrior i'm always biased towards mages our so called counterclass. I too think mages needs their pve side improved alot its not okay to be weaker than warlocks in both single and multi target dps.
However on the PVP side i think mages are pretty fine, they need(and will get) some dispel protection, what they should not get is an increase in both dps and survivability as that can throw off balance pretty easily. Does that mean mages shouldnt get new funny stuff to play(and excel skillwise) with? No, not at all they should get whatever possible to improve their experience.
Another point i can't believe mages(and other closses) are sayin dev's love warriors, we have remained unchanged for a few years now, we didnt get ANYTHING remotely new/fun at Burning Crusade(okay i forgot spell reflect which was pretty bad at BC release and s1), did this put us at a disadvantage? Hell no, a skill we got 7 years ago saved our day (MS) but my actionbars look exactly the same like they did when doin some WSG premades for high ranks. To summarize this i think warriors are at a very balanced state besides rng-spec ehhh mace it's the classes backing the warriors that are overpowered, mainly Druids and Rogues.
(PVE Dps needs to be improved tho :P)
Reply