New Player's Guide: Class Psychology
This week, we get to tackle a fun topic: personality disorders. I mean, how your personality type can help determine what class you might feel comfortable playing. Now, it's prudent I mention that I am not a degreed mental health professional -- heck, I'm not even a degreed writer. I tried to play a doctor on TV but was told I had a face made for writing, preferably in seclusion in a fortified compound. So, while these may do a good job at matching your personality type to a class, I'm not making any judgment on whether I think you're nuttier than a bar mix. There's also a certain amount of tongues and cheeks involved here, as well. In fact, if you pretend the guy that does the voice-overs for the "Real Men of Genius" ads is reading these you'll get an idea of how tongue in cheek they are. Aside: Holy Cow, the original Survivor vocalist does the background singing on those? I did not know that.
- The Tank: Your job is hold the monster's attention. Your going to have decent defense, but your main job is just generating threat. You may not contribute a ton of damage towards the kill, but keeping the monster's attention focused on you will make it a smooth ride.
- The Healer: Primarily, your job will be keeping the tank alive. Sure, you'll also be healing the rest of the party, but the tank will be your focus.
- Damage Per Second (DPS): With the tank contributing slow but steady damage, and the healer, well, healing, it's your job to actually bring the monster down.
I'm going to break down the classes into the following types of the people:
- You need to be in the front of the action.
- You're much happier supporting the action.
- You just want to do as much damage as fast as you can.
- The grass is always greener on the other side, or you're really indecisive.
- Oh, yeah, I forgot, the misanthropist who hates groups.
- Here's to you, he or she doing whatever you darn well feel like anyway.
You need to be at the front of the action:
The first word out of your mouth when you were born was "charge" and we won't even go into how you marked your targets when you played Army. Richard Marcinko is your personal hero. His Rogue Warrior's Guide to Leadership has earned a permanent spot on your nightstand.
You. Sir (or Madam) are a Warrior. Standing in the front of the action, yelling "climb on my back, boys," knowing that the success or failure of the instance run is your hands. Oh, now we all know the four other people behind you are just as vital, but not in your mind.
You're much happier supporting the action:
My friend, you are a Priest. You probably work in the support industry, either as a call center person, crisis manager, roadie, or are just an all-around "I'll be there for you, really" person. You're more than happy letting the tank take the credit for how well things went, because, unlike him, you know your heals were what saved the day. You realize that not everyone can be a rock star, but also know that what makes rock stars, rock stars is a ... never mind.
The grass is always greener on the other side, or you're really indecisive:
You probably stand at the store shelves way too long, comparing two brands of shampoo. "This one will make my hair light and wavy," you say looking at one bottle. As your gaze shifts to the one on the right, "But this one gives a deep clean, and a natural sheen." The class you play is fantastic. It's like the developers knew this was the class for you and lovingly created it with your vision in mind... until next week when you think clearly the developer hated you, what did you ever do to deserve this? You could be prone to indecision, or, you just like to keep your options open. Sometimes you might want to tank, sometimes you might want to heal, sometimes you might just want to do damage. As the commercial said, sometimes you feel like a nut, and sometimes you don't.
Consider rolling a hybrid: Paladin, Druid, or a Shaman. Both Paladins and Druids can make effective tanks. Yes. I know. We had this argument already. Shamans and Druids can also switch between dps and healing. In fact, if you're really indecisive and don't mind a lot of respec fees, you can make an argument that the Druid is the most versatile. However, versatility comes at a cost: while hybrids are good jack-of-all-trades, they don't have the singular specialty that tend to make "pure" classes preferable when forming groups. However, depending on how far into the endgame you go, these differences may not even come into play.
You just want to do damage. Lots of it. As fast as you can do it:
Your destiny lies in DPS, so look at a Mage, Hunter, Warlock, or Rogue. However, like Anakin Skywalker, you're going to need to learn to control your anger. Unleash too much damage, and you'll end up with an upset monster attacking you, and an even more upset healer and tank trying to get things back in order. Most, if not all, of these classes will have a secondary job: crowd control (when more than one monster come on a pull, often you will want to freeze one of them in place). Arguably, Mages are the best at this with their sheep spell. Hunter traps have cool-downs and a decent chance of being resisted. Warlock's banish only works on demons and elementals -- and while they can fear, ,it's often not a good idea to send a monster scurrying away, and Rogue's sap only works on humanoids (plus you need to sneak up on it). As an aside, Warriors also can be specialized for DPS, but I'm not going too far down that road right now.
Oh, yeah, I forgot, the misanthropist who hates groups:
As a card-carrying member of this Local, if you really, really hate playing with people, allow me to point you to these other fine Blizzard products. While it's possible to solo just about any class to max level, once you hit the cap, it's a grouping game, so that's gotta be your bag, baby. If you really want to solo, take a look at the Hunter class since it's one of the better solo classes.
Here's to you, he or she doing whatever you darn well feel like anyway:
While I've tried to match some personality traits to character roles, there's one final, but important piece of advice: Play whatever class you think fits you best. Blizzard has thoughtfully described all of the classes here. If you read them, and even thought you're a type-a, lead from the front type of person, but I "said" you shouldn't be a Priest and you really want to play one, ignore me. Play the Priest. See if I care.
[edit: Looks like Part Time Druid had the same idea (and two weeks ago to boot. Talk about synchronicity.). I'm giving them some link love for accidentally cribbing his idea.]
Filed under: Druid, Hunter, Mage, Paladin, Priest, Rogue, Shaman, Warlock, Warrior, New Players' Guide
Patch 5.3 interview with Ghostcrawler
Mystery of the Unborn Val'kyr
The latest patch 5.3 news
All of the latest Mists of Pandaria news






Reader Comments (Page 2 of 2)
Candina@WH Jul 16th 2008 2:45PM
Wow... I haven't heard this much bitching about someone else's writing since Freshman journalism 'group' projects.
Sheesh people. Relax.
It's just a blog, don't treat it like it is a real news writer. :-)
And while I think that he did IN FACT duplicate the 'The grass is always greener on the other side, or you're really indecisive.' line. The delicious irony of having it in their twice was most amusing. It would have been even better if it were
'The grass is always greener on the other side, or you're really indecisive.' the first time and
'You're really indecisive, and the grass is always greener on the other side' the second time.
Now the 'healers job is to keep the healer alive' is an obvious brain lock, but I found the article light, fluffy and full of low-cal win ;-)
Lori Jul 17th 2008 2:06PM
Well, since the bloggers get paid for their blogs, shouldn't they put more effort into making them readable with out us having to figure out what they are saying? If they are going to do the job, they should do their best to do it right.
Also, I think readers are just getting fed up with mangled blogs and starting to be less forgiving. There have been a lot of them lately.
Cynra Jul 16th 2008 2:47PM
Very interesting concept, just poorly implemented. I'm usually very supportive of articles on WoWInsider and I feel like a heel for speaking up, but I really had some problems understanding different passages without going back to reread it and guess what you were saying. You may want to consider having someone else read future articles for you; I find that even having a friend pretend to be an editor for a day can help make things a little clearer.
I did enjoy your "Ask WoWInsider" feature, but don't remember there being as confused in those posts.
Cynra Jul 16th 2008 2:52PM
As an aside, I tried to click on the link for Richard Marcinko (didn't recognize the name, sorry!) and ended up getting nothing. The link you have (javascript:void(0);/*1215958580963*/) is some sort of bastardized javascript. You did prompt me to look up the gentleman on Wikipedia, however! (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Marcinko)
Also, I'm definitely the support. Even when I'm in the unlikely position of tanking, I'm doing it because I want to assist more than I want the center of attention. Probably explains why I keep rolling priests. And more priests. And yet another priest...
erin Jul 16th 2008 2:50PM
This article has a good idea behind it .. giving a total WoW beginner the quick low down on the different classes and enabling them to make an informed choice (albeit marginally) on their first character, depending on which type of person they are.
But it's very badly written and edited, or not as the case may be ;)
Incidentally, the link posted above by Saramickle (I shall post it again http://parttimedruid.com/2008/07/01/the-psychology-of-class-choice-in-wow/) is a way better read.
irishdoom Jul 16th 2008 2:52PM
Thanks to the people that have linked my article. I was going to complain a bit, but I see that the author is getting enough grief already! :)
Mark Crump Jul 16th 2008 6:09PM
Wow, I did not know he did that. Sorry for the crib, man. Link love given. :)
PartTimeDruid Jul 16th 2008 3:00PM
Hmm...time to change my user name already.
Senotonom205 Jul 16th 2008 3:10PM
OMG!!!! SO MANY TYPOS!!!
Jeez everyone needs to just cool it, its a freaking blog post, this isnt the New York Times. Was it impossible for you to understand what the writer was trying to say? I know it didnt for me, if it did, you really shouldn't be criticizing anyone for their typos. I'm so sick of listening to people complain about minor typos on these boards, just let it go.
Good post though
Naix Jul 16th 2008 3:39PM
"The Healer: Primarily, your job will be keeping the healer alive. "
Yes I am the one I heal.
/castsequence target=self Heal
zappo Jul 16th 2008 3:51PM
"I want to be the essential linchpin in an environment. I like being empowered and not disposable, yet I am alright with feeling obligated to fill a role even if I don't really feel like doing it on any given day." -- roll a tank, probably a warrior
"I want to feel needed. " -- roll a healer. If you also like to create drama you should create a priest over other healer types. Probably female, probably human.
"I love to receive loot even if I can't use it in any practical sense" -- roll a hunter
"This game is complicated" -- roll a warlock and keybind everything to shadowbolt
"I'm an @#$)&hole!" -- roll a rogue
"I can't decide if I want to heal, dps, or tank.." -- druid is probably the best. There isn't much you cannot do.
"Um... I'll just do what everyone else is doing until I really decide" -- night elf hunter.
-- ps, this post was not serious :p
Sannleikur Jul 16th 2008 4:14PM
Hey, these people get paid to write, and WoWInsider attempts to portray itself as a professional source of information. The subject of the information is irrelevant, quality should always be a priority if you want to be considered professional.
I've noticed the quality of posts going down lately, due to both sloppy writing and inadequate editing. It makes a difference to people who care about quality, and the quality of the writing has a direct effect on the perception of the quality of the information being conveyed.
Do a better job, WoWInsider.
MechChef Jul 16th 2008 4:28PM
lol @ the harshness
Mac Jul 16th 2008 4:52PM
Heh, I must admit I read all the typos as deliberate after the initial disclaimer.
"Your primary job will be to keep the healer alive" is classic. Ive played a priest in pugs enough to know this is exactly true.
The double up of "Grass is greener" is especially amusing for its irony value.
However, as a Ret pally main, the "Respect fees" is by far and away the best line in the whole article.
bitssy Jul 16th 2008 5:30PM
Boy, did you nail it good this time! I had shammies and nuked them....too many totems. I had a priest, nuked her too....didnt want to heal. I do have a 70 orc hunter that is my first 70, and a chubby lil gnome mage who is my second 70....and i just love both of them. Second in line are my locks-both factions....seems like I do very well with a "helper" (blueberry or pet cat). I find mages, hunters and locks the most enjoyable classes in the game. Yes, I have tried all of the other classes, and I do have a pally...she is sorta just sittin for now as i only play her when I have lots of uninterrupted play time to devote to her...gotta actually think about what to do with her and all her spells and whatnot. Good going...still love your site
Terrant Jul 16th 2008 5:37PM
I'm skeptical that different classes actually are suited to different personalities. In every class you have the type-A elitists who like to argue on forums, those who constantly play the victim card and blame everyone else for all their woes, the number-obsessed theorycrafters who transform the game into a spreadsheet, the simple-minded who just enjoy big numbers from crits or from topping charts...
Mark Crump Jul 16th 2008 6:09PM
Sorry for the typos, folks. I wasn't feeling so hot last night doing the final edits and pushed it as far out as I could today, with my intent being to take another look at it when I woke up.
That plan failed when I woke up feeling "worse" if you know what I mean.
I hindsight I should have just held it back a day or two, but hindsight's usually 20/20, isn't it. :)
Schadow Jul 16th 2008 6:24PM
"You. Sir (or Madam) are a Warrior. Standing in the front of the action, yelling "climb on my back, boys," knowing that the success or failure of the instance run is your hands."
Um, when talking instances, you're describing the Prot Pally. The warrior is the one marking things and explaining that "yes, you can sheep in combat" to some scrub mage.
The prot pally crashes in, pisses off everything in the instance, and stands tall against the onslaught while the support staff struggles to match his damage done.
5-mans are Pally territory these days. The warrior can usually be identified as the 4th DPS, biding his time until he can hit T5 content where he is actually needed for something that a Pally or Druid doesn't do as well or better.
Taytayflan Jul 16th 2008 6:29PM
Someone else reads Dick Marcinko? I thought I was alone.
Asgaroth Aug 5th 2008 12:26PM
Hello,
Well I do have a M.A. in Applied Psychology, and this blog gives me a good idea about creating a simple assessment, to assist and inform people of which class may be the best for them. I don't think it has been done yet or has it?