Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-17-2008 @ 8:06AM
aburt said...
Im the same, i have a warlock, warrior, and druid level 70 but my hunter is the first character i ever made and hes stuck at 50. Its not that its hard to level, i just get bored of it too easily. And also whenever I pick him up to play all i ever see while leveling is hunter bots running around and it makes me sad to play the class, so i give up.
Reply
7-17-2008 @ 10:49AM
FireStar said...
Same here too. Hunter was my first to 60. Now i have 4 70s and my hunter is only 65. I'm levelling a 49 shaman and a 44 mage right now. Oh well.
7-17-2008 @ 11:05AM
Boszorkany said...
My first toon was a hunter as well. Could NOT get her past 26. No idea why. I feel your pain.
My main now is a warlock. She hit 70 a couple of weeks ago. It was a struggle to get to 40 with her, but the class just grew on me and I have to say she's my favorite.
I started a rogue a few months ago but can't seem to get up the energy to get her to 20. I started a rogue with the purpose of eventually taking revenge for all the times I've been ganked by rogues. But, like with the hunter, I'm not getting the hang of the class.
I guess it all comes down to whether or not you're a (insert class here) person. Like anything in life, some people can rock a particular talent, some are mediocre and others just can't do it.
7-17-2008 @ 1:19PM
xtole said...
Its called multi-tag and bag. My hunter is leveling faster than my other 70s, and I dont even quest that much. Grab a tanking pet, like a boar, and learn how to grab multiple mobs at once and hold agro.
7-17-2008 @ 3:29PM
Nick S said...
yep, what xtole said. make it a goal to never be killing one mob at a time - when i was questing on my hunter i often grabbed two or 3 mobs, trapped one, kited one, and pet-tanked another.
hunters are much less visceral than warriors - you lose that feeling of hitting an enemy like a heavily-armed linebacker. there is joy to be found in playing a hunter, though, i promise.
7-18-2008 @ 12:27AM
krat2 said...
Nick S nailed it on the head: Visceral. Hunters (and all ranged DPS) lack the visceral appeal of a lot of other classes. My 70s are, in general, all about the visceral fun of it: Enhancement Shaman (Elemental? yawn), Feral Druid (Laserchickens are okay, but ranged? meh.), Prot Pally (killing 15 things at once ROCKS!). Only my Warlock is a pet class, but he's not nearly as much raw fun as the melee toons. Oh, two healers, too... but those are for grouping, not for raw fun.
I tried my hand at Mages... and they bored me to tears. Hunters, also, are generally dull... mine languishes at 60. Still, maybe they would be more fun if I fought as above... trying to always be fighting 3+ baddies. That sounds like it's worth trying.
Still, "in yer face" toons are much more satisfying. That's what your problem is with Hunters, Mr. Rossi.