Totem Talk: The future, shaman?
Welcome back to Totem Talk. Last week I said we're talk about pre-Kara cloth and leather gear for shamans. So of course, being my usual distracted, scatterbrained self, I've spent the entire week poondering and fretting about completely unrelated issues like shaman stacking for 25 man raids, the future of the shaman class when totems go raid-wide in Wrath, shamans in PvP and other such issues facing the class.The cloth and leather discussion is still important (the comment thread from last week was very active, which I always take as a sign that you guys want to talk about it) and so I want to give it the detail it deserves. I think at this point it should go beyond Karazhan and into drops in ZA, SSC, TK with an eye towards gearing your shaman for Hyjal Summit and Black Temple. Which means I should also expand on a basic gear guide for what drops you'd want to get BT/Hyjal ready for all shaman specs, and that's going to take a few columns to do properly. I'm aiming to start that next week, unless you guys leave a lot of comments telling me you're totally uninterested.
So first let's talk about PvP, or at least my recent experiences with it, and then we'll talk about Shaman Stacking..
Okay, shamans in PvP: in my experience, it's still resto or elemental unless you're more than averagely talented at PvP.
I am not more than averagely talented at PvP. At best, I'm getting better at going into some weird furious spasm of hate and unloading damage, but my poor enhancement shaman is getting rolled like the town drunk in arenas. 2x2, 3x3, 5x5 it really does not matter. I don't know that I think we really need much more in the way of fixing than what's coming in Wrath already, but as of right now, enhancement is still not the best choice for arena PvP in my opinion. It can be done... my 2x2 partner plays his enhancement shaman in a 3x3 setup and does really well with... but it requires both skill and a really precise knowledge of the class in PvP that I, frankly, lack. I find it much, much easier to spec resto and heal my way through the Arenas, because (barring things like counterspell, stunlock, or being killed by focus fire) it's more or less the same in PvP or PvE: find the people losing health and cast a heal on them.
I run 3x3 with an elemental shaman on my warrior. Let me just say holy crap, my hat's off to you, I could never do that. While I'm still learning and experimenting with elemental as a playstyle the 40/0/21 build can crank out some really impressive burst damage. It's definitely a gib or be gibbed spec but when it works, it can put a massive hurting on a team. Again, I'm not geared nor skilled enough to pull it off myself. Basically, my experience in PvP seems to be saying that what problems shaman have revolve around mobility and escape, and that while I'd argue that they're not broken there is a level of skill required for playing them to their fullest that I haven't mastered yet. Hex is going to be very welcome, I can say that with assurance.
Quite frankly, what I really want to hear from you guys is how you cope with Arena PvP. What are your specs, your strategies? I can read various forums and websites until my eyes bleed, but after a while it starts to run together, and one of the things I enjoy about writing this column is how much I can learn from you guys. Any tips for enhancement PvP would be welcome. Are you guys finding the instant cast Ghost Wolf to be worth the points? (I've resisted picking it up, but if I'm wrong I'll be the first to go grab it.)
Now that we've covered that at least well enough for you guys to come in and school me (be honest, you were going to do so anyway) let's talk about 'shaman stacking'. This is the practice for guilds on the bleeding edge of raiding content to bring four or five (or more) shamans to a raid in order to have access to multiple Bloodlusts or Heroism casts to make killing a boss easier. You really see this in Sunwell guilds more than at any other level of raiding, as the ability to chain cast 30% haste on a DPS group helps burn down hard bosses much faster, assuming that threat isn't an issue. Other groups use it to get a near raid-wide haste effect, since five shamans = one for every 5 man group in a 25 man. While this particular use of the ability doesn't grant the sustained higher raid DPS that stacking and rotating shamans in and out of DPS groups can, it does mean that healing and tanking also benefits from the haste effect, allowing for overall boosted raid productivity in all three areas.
To a degree, I don't see what all the fuss is about. My guild often raids with six or seven druids, just because that's who we have to raid with: two or three feral tanks, two druid healers and two moonkin. You could just as easily say we're battle-res stacking with that many druids. If a guild is taking five shamans to raids that still leaves 20 slots for the other seven classes. As for the argument that it trivializes raid content, I don't get it. When we bring four or five paladins (which happens quite often, as we have two dedicated prot paladins and three healing paladins who rotate in and out, plus a ret paladin who specs prot when needed) no one complains that five paladin blessings available trivializes anything. Does anyone not like getting Kings, Might, Salvation and Light? (Casters might prefer Wisdom, admittedly.) Or having the potential for an almost total raid coverage from auras? Sure, having access to a longer or more raid-wide period of haste for really hard fights is pretty nice, but so is having six DPS warriors to spam execute when a boss is at 20% (I have been in this raid, it was kind of awesome) but in the end guilds are going to raid with the people they have. We didn't set out to have more druids than the eye could see, it just sort of happened. (To provide context, we raid with three shamans, one of each spec, and frankly that seems to be enough shamans for us to kill the bosses as we come to them.)
Are some end game guilds recruiting and/or having players reroll shamans, even bringing them along on BT and Hyjal runs to gear them up fast? Yes. We know this is happening, my question is, why is it bad? A bare 2% of guilds are even in Sunwell, according to Wowjutsu (I have no idea how accurate this number is, but let's run with it for discussion) and so, to my mind it's not having a tremendous impact on how the majority of people play the game if those guilds stack for any specific class or benefit. Furthermore, unless new information comes to light, at present I see no movement away from Bloodlust/Heroism working on a party level, meaning that while you'll have raidwide totem benefit (which to my mind will make having at least three shamans of varying specs absolutely delightful for raiding) you'll still need to stack shamans if you want raidwide haste, to say nothing of rotating shamans into a DPS group to maximize its hasted output.
I guess I just don't see the problem or how it trivializes anything, but I'm admittedly not in Sunwell yet.
Okay, now we leave things open for you to comment... well, that happens anyway, really, we have a form for it and everything. Shaman stacking, bad, good or neither?
Filed under: Shaman, Analysis / Opinion, PvP, Raiding, (Shaman) Totem Talk, Arena






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
yicheng04 Jul 17th 2008 6:26PM
No offense, but exactly how long did it take the author to write this "article"? Seems like most of this is thinly-disguised request for reader comments, and disorganized at that. The author seems to stumble across disjointed topics like Arena PvP, Sunwell raiding, and WoW:LK speculation without any transition or chain of logic, with nothing to support any of the points except the author's own opinion. Even an interview or two with some more experienced raiders or PvP'ers might help a bit. I can understand how the author might be late for a raid, and pressed for time, but come on! I've seen blog entries that were more coherent than this!!
Matthew Rossi Jul 17th 2008 6:37PM
This *is* a blog entry.
Wulfhere Jul 17th 2008 6:39PM
Hee.
"No offense, but you suck."
You're awesome. I mean, to actually open with no offense and then call someone dogcrap... that's beautiful. I wish I could do that but I just don't have large enough gonads for it. Kudos, dude. You make trolling easy. I can just sit back and let you do all the work.
Nick S Jul 17th 2008 6:59PM
Semantics around the word "blog" aside, is it unfair for the readership to expect professional-quality entries on WoWInsider? I'd say that the 1st poster's comment is unnecessarily vitriolic, but I believe that what he was saying is essentially true.
When we as readers visit a site which clearly (and I'm not saying this is a bad thing) profits from advertising, isn't it reasonable to expect that the material we are exposed to be of high quality? There is an implicit contract in professional web publication that poorly written posts seem to violate.
That said, I didn't think that this post was terrible, though it does depart from the single-topic format that WI typically employs in its articles.
Gzub Jul 17th 2008 7:18PM
Since this is a Rossi post, I just want to point out that he's stroking his epeen, he's a stinkin' braggart, he's a loser with too many 70s, he's a poor husband, an awful father to his future kids, and he's clearly not capable of producing the kind of quality posts that WoW Insider was originally created for.
yicheng04 Jul 17th 2008 7:39PM
There's a difference between criticizing the writing and criticizing the writer. I guess there was a lot of Rossi-bashing today, so my post might have been lumped together with the others. Just to be clear, I neither care about nor care to defame the person that is Michael Rossi, just this particular "blog/article" that he wrote. If you can't separate those two things, you need to seriously get out more.
And yes, if you have a website that's obviously profiting from web-traffic-generated revenue, I think it's a reasonable expectation for the readers to expect entertaining and informative articles. It's partly because I like this site (daily visitor) that I'm taking the time to post feedback.
Gzub Jul 17th 2008 8:55PM
I agree that Michael Rossi just mailed this one in. At least we can always count on Matt Schramm, David Whitcomb, and Amelia Dean.
ablackflame Jul 18th 2008 1:21PM
matt dont listen to them. they are the yuppies of the blog generation, expecting prose and then flaming when a writer tries to open up a down to earth conversation with his readers.
and for the love of god, mr. rossi has never once bragged about having multiple 70s. Ive read him brag that they are warriors, and for good reason...Warriors are da' bomb.
remember y'all, matt cranks out these posts for you to read, enjoy, learn from, discuss, disagree upon. Attack the post if you must be try to be a little more observant to what the true nature of the post was.
Pappagallo Jul 18th 2008 2:16PM
Please do not feed the trolls.
boytisoy Jul 17th 2008 6:45PM
I agree with Yicheng04. The article is clearly uninspired. The author begins his pieces the same way as well, each and every time, whether it's for the Warrior column, or this, the Shaman column.
It is understandable, however, seeing as how the author has been writing this column for more than a year now, even before his Shaman ever reached Outlands.
My opinion: if you don't have the passion to continue a dedicated column for a particular class, might as well give it up to someone who actually has substantial things to say about it.
Jez Jul 17th 2008 6:46PM
Bring back yicheng03.
You fail.
alan Jul 17th 2008 6:49PM
As far as your arena comments go, I agree. Hopefully there will be more in wrath for shaman pvp. Shaman was my main since launch, but I've had to abandon him for pvp. Right now it is too frustrating for me to play. I have a warrior and rogue at 70, and although not as well geared as the shaman, they are both so much more fun to play arena with. Of course it helps that warrior and rogue are basically like turning on god-mode compared to shaman :)
Sodon Jul 17th 2008 6:52PM
I find this kind of article much more compelling than a 3-page long list of items that anyone with half a brain and access to Wowhead or AtlasLoot could figure out themselves.
Xiinkyaku Jul 17th 2008 6:55PM
Well, this is a **blog** and the article clearly showed that Matthew wanted to use this week post as a way to debate shaman issues, as pvp and raid stacking, with his commenters. Unfortunately, it seems his idea will be derailed by trolls.
Oneiroi Jul 17th 2008 7:43PM
Seconded.
His post was fine. Every post won't say exactly what you want.
He was opening this up to a discussion, less whining from commenter, more discussing.
Camelrage Jul 17th 2008 7:17PM
I have no problem with stacking shamans in particular. I was however in a guild where the GM insisted having 5 shamans every raid for bloodlust, even when we were recruiting shamans well undergeared and bringing them to progression fights, not to mention he hated enhancements and elementals so they all ended up being resto shamans, combine that with his desire to have 3-4 pallies (not prot or ret cos they werent "viable" accordfing to him) there were never many spaces left for priests/druid healers which annoyed me because we were failing as a result
fables429 Jul 17th 2008 7:01PM
Roll a resto druid then you might have something useful to talk about for pvp, haha at nublet shaman's.
Marcus Jul 17th 2008 7:03PM
Man is it hate on Rossi day, cause I missed the memo. He took some jabs on the Breakfast topic too.
Personally I don't read articles that I'm not interested in (and I really didn't read this one, sorry Rossi) but dumping hate over such an insignificant article seems pointless, unless your point was to add a little negativity to the day and hurt the writer. If that's the case, then well done.
Michael Jul 17th 2008 7:16PM
Is someone complaining about Shaman stacking in Sunwell? Too many Shamans at the expense of...? Throw me a bone here!
epsilon343 Jul 17th 2008 7:25PM
I think I might have to echo the sentiments of the other people...this post seemed a little weak. As a Shaman I'd like to see some more in depth information that could help me be a better player, but it seems like getting something useful is hit or miss at best.