WotLK Beta patch notes and other news

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

7-18-2008 @ 9:06AM

divilish said...

So, seriously? Where are the big buffs that will balance the fact that a mages crowd control will now cost such a huge chunk of his mana pool? What about a proportional cost/benefit scenario? It will be 12% of your base mana, and for every 100 mana points that entails it will add a 1 sec bonus to the sheep.

Come on Blizz, yeah, the best mages out there can rock teh Arenas, the best mages out there can hold their DPS up to stellar levels and lay the smack down in raids, but in a patch that buffs so many other classes to nerf crowd control?!? Where's our awesome DPS buffs? Where's our enhanced mana pool control?

Not QQ'ing, just hoping and reminding Blizz that if you want people to play mage, you've got to give as much as take away.

Div

7-18-2008 @ 10:45AM

AJ said...

agreed.

Why are they making sap and repentance usable on demons, dragonkin etc. but i haven't heard anything about sheep...

7-18-2008 @ 11:12AM

Kaeb said...

Appreciate your frustrations with Poly, AJ, but my rogue main is never brought as "DPS" because I can "only CC humans."

I understand that, atm, a table and poly are the two biggest reasons for mages in a 5man over lock or rogue, but it's nice that they're giving us a little something.

I hope they turn the mages DPS to 11 to compensate for all the % of base crap they're pulling.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.