Bornakk tries to clarify fair play in Arena PvP

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

7-31-2008 @ 8:37PM

Jagoex said...

Sadly, when considering the game's two distinct design road maps, I think it is safe to say that the current model of Arena PvP will never be fair, and nor is it a good measure of a player's skill. And while all PvP systems have been exploited in the past, the Arena is by far the most exploit-heavy.

Things will need to change big time if it should one day be considered a serious competitive platform.

8-01-2008 @ 12:16AM

Radiophonic said...

Arena stinks. My opinion is further enforced by some of the teams I've heard about. For example: 5 mages, that's just stupid. There has to be some limitations, such as no more than 2 of the same class on a 5v5.

That 5 mage team simply owned everyone they went up against. I call unfair advantage and, oh yeah, arena stinks.

8-01-2008 @ 1:56AM

lolatyou said...

Actually all the top 5 teams are a mix of all different classes... Just because you don't like arena doesn't mean you can make up crap and pass it off as true, a 5 mage team would get dominated by any team with teamwork, lol, clothies.

8-01-2008 @ 11:25AM

dart said...

Actually, 5 shaman were top of a Battlegroup.

And yes, 5 Mages are bad.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.