Breaking news Feed
- Jimmy Fallon's Late Night: We are the World of Warcraft
- Patch 5.4 PTR: More spell changes to facilitate warlock talent nerfs
- Patch 5.4 PTR: Arena tie-break system revamp with a 1,000% damage buff
- A first glimpse inside the Siege of Orgrimmar (Spoiler Alert!)
- Patch 5.4 PTR: Kil'jaeden's Cunning nerfs explained
Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-12-2008 @ 8:20AM
Wasuremono said...
Yes they take it too far. It's okay to have a few Haris Pilton NPC's or a few clouded references such as the orginal Hemet Nessingwary questlines or the Legend of Zelda questlines but when it becomes a major instance in the game (Zul'Aman) or a major faction and questline like DEHTA then it is too far. Simply renaming the DEHTA faction and making it less of a reference to PETA would make it a whole lot easier to swallow.
Reply
8-12-2008 @ 8:52AM
Zali said...
There are plenty of Darrowshire type questlines. (my personal favorite.) I just don't see how a little tongue and cheek humor is taking it too far. I think one of the reasons that WOW is so successful with so many people is that it hosts a fantastic amount of diversity in game content.
8-13-2008 @ 10:33AM
Juliah said...
Yep, I agree with both you and Daniel. Humor should be a sprinkled accent in a game like this, not the main course. It should be used sparingly, like salt: a little goes a long way.