Skip to Content
8-16-2008 @ 5:14PM
Hey guys, there was no QQ in this post. What are you going on about? Saying "wouldn't it be nice if..." isn't QQ. Wow, you're a hard bunch to please; anything that isn't "ZOMG BLIZZ I LOV U AN WANT UR BABBIES" is now QQ?I loved the mirror image idea when I first saw it; it fits well into the whole "mage as a clever trickster" idea, along with invisibility and blink.Familiars to be honest I can' see happening, and don't really want, as even if they are non-combat it's too close to warlocks. Familiars are a classic part of sorcery, but that part has already been taken by warlocks, along with the pentagrams and baby-brain-eating. We just burn things.As for Blink working, dear God in heaven please yes. I'd love it. I really would. That is one really valid complaint a mage has; one could say the only really valid one.Anyway, here's to a slightly longer post next week; not that I didn't enjoy this one.
8-16-2008 @ 5:30PM
ive seen a ghetto fix on a *gasp* private server to get around the blink glitch. instead of using the current mechanics, the spell just threw you, physically thru the air, and you landed 20 yards in the direction you were facing. not a likely path for blizz to go, but I NEVER blinked backwards for the whole hour or so i was there.
First time? A confirmation email will be sent to you after submitting.
Members enter your username and password.
Enter your AOL or AIM screenname and password.
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.