Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-11-2008 @ 3:19PM
rick gregory said...
Of course. The people against this never really had a good reason - it was always a variation on "we had to walk uphill both ways in my day..."
The old rule ignored several issues:
1) the player who levelled on a pvp server, transferred to a PvE to play with friends, friends quit. That person DID level PvP, so the primary objection doesn't hold.
2) People who could level on a new/low pop PvP server with minimal ganking and then transfer to a more populated PvP server.
3) Guild recruitment is much harder when guilds on PvE servers can't get raiders on a PvP server to move over because of reason 2... Player might want to move, guild might love to have them but the player can't take the chance and get stranded. Now they can.
4) The converse of #3 - My 70s can now potentially transfer to PvP realms in my timezone or with better raid times which gives me more options.