Activision doing well, Blizzard has spent $200M in upkeep on WoW
Activision Blizzard (the parent company of Blizzard Entertainment) held an Analyst's Day earlier this week (in which a bunch of stock analysts sit down to crunch numbers and predict the future), and they came out of it really well -- according to those in the know, Activision Blizzard is set to do very well in the future. Buoyed by Blizzard and their other big franchises (do we have to name them by now? Call of Duty, Guitar Hero, etc.), 99% of analysts give the stock a "Buy" or "Hold" rating, and many were impressed with what Activision told them about their releases in 2009.And we got another interesting insight into just what kind of money Blizzard is looking at -- they reported on the call that since 2004, they've spent $200 million on the upkeep of World of Warcraft alone. That includes things like payroll, customer support, and hardware updates, of which there have been plenty of those. $200 million does seem like a lot, but of course when you consider just how much revenue they've pulled in via subscriptions (ten million players paying up to $15 a month, though Blizzard has all kinds of different subscription plans around the world), $200 million over four years isn't all that much.
We're told, though, that that money doesn't include any development costs (pre-release, and we're not sure if it includes patch/expansion development or not, either). And it certainly doesn't include Blizzard-wide costs, like their new HQ, or what they spend on advertising, promotion, and those big events held around the world. There's no question, however, that there's plenty of money coming both in and out of Blizzard's doors.
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Blizzard, Expansions, Making money, Hardware






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
lollercats Sep 16th 2008 6:37PM
199.9 million dollars of that was to fix the ret tree.
Rodrigo Sep 16th 2008 8:14PM
Maybe in another four years they'll have enough to pay to a developer to unlock 2 parallel talent specs...
Balius Sep 16th 2008 6:12PM
In corporate terms, $200,000,000 isn't really all that exciting over the length of time WoW's been around. If they aren't making that much back at least every two months or so on monthly subscriprions alone, I'd be surprised.
Between the buy-in price, the monthly subscriptions, the tie-in products (the WoW Cardgame, Warcraft books, and tabletop RPG), and increased interest in related older products (I watched someone buy "Battlechest" ahead of me in line at the store just today), the money spent on upkeep is trivial.
gton Sep 16th 2008 7:57PM
subscriptions should bring in 150 mil dollars a month so looks ok for blizzard.. they deserve to make profit though for making this great game
alb Sep 16th 2008 6:32PM
Trivial indeed. What is impressive is the wads most likely lining top shareholder and CEO pockets right now.
Xtyle Sep 17th 2008 8:18AM
... and should! ;)
Kryptonls Sep 16th 2008 6:45PM
Blizzard are reeling in a minimum of ~£1bn a year on subscriptions alone, worldwide - with an article like this talking about the things they spend money on towards the end, almost sounds like you want us to feel sorry for them and their overheads.
AB are stinking rich - they're not quite done with us yet, and certainly aren't going anywhere either for sometime.
Ahoni Sep 16th 2008 6:59PM
Where do you get the 1 billion a year figure from?
Eversor Sep 16th 2008 7:15PM
15$ a month time 10 million time 12 = 1,800,000,000 bucks. About half might go to server maintenance, staff paychecks and perhaps other projects. 1 billion still standing to make them feel stinkin' rich.
Ahoni Sep 16th 2008 8:00PM
/sigh
Press release for 2Q 2008 results
http://play.tm/wire/click/2038960
"For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Vivendi reported 223 million euros in revenues and 42 million euros in EBITA for Vivendi Games which includes the results of Blizzard Entertainment®."
42 million for one quarter for Vivendi Games, which includes ALL of Blizzard, including World of Warcraft, Warcraft, Diablo 1/2, Starcraft, etc. If we multiply that times four we get 168 million in revenue. Ok, this is Euros, not dollars, but that is still a wee bit shy of 1 billion dollars a year.
Kryptonls Sep 17th 2008 3:28AM
Right my brief play with numbers went like this:
$15/£9 a month - there are many people that pay on direct debit, so they pay less a month. Let's take £8 for those people, then times that by 12 (for 12 months in a year...) and then again by 10 million.
8*12*10m = £960m = ~£1bn/pa.
And there's no way I am reading that entire press release just to see how the numbers add up. Chances are they don't - but who really cares that much?
Ahoni Sep 17th 2008 8:31AM
Most World of Warcraft players DO NOT pay $15 a month. Most WoW players do not live in N. America or Europe where those payment plans are active.
Arturis Sep 16th 2008 6:47PM
I'm not so worried about the upkeep - what concerns me is, when are they going to reach the unit cap? And once there, will they then zerg rush EA's base?
Balius Sep 16th 2008 7:12PM
There really aren't nearly enough farms in WoW to support all the units, and the town halls are WAY too far from gold mines.
naixdra Sep 16th 2008 6:53PM
I know this has nothing to do with nothing, but did anyone else notice that they changed the pic?
PS yes Blizz is rich, b!tch
Mattimus Sep 16th 2008 7:02PM
Yeah... I liked the other pic more. Hm.
Skarlette Sep 16th 2008 11:13PM
But it's classic Scrooge McDuck now! Which is awesome. :)
jurandr Sep 16th 2008 6:57PM
Is it just me, or was the picture on this one changed? I rather liked the hunter named activision with the blizzard cat :/
Grymnar Sep 17th 2008 2:30AM
Well we also know that some of that $ goes to Starcraft 2, Diablo 3 and "Next Gen MMO". So its seems not all of the cash is used for making a swimming pool filled with cash
Kalizkan Sep 17th 2008 5:33AM
To anyone doing a bit of their own number crunching please remember than many of the 10 million (ish) subscribers will come from the Asian market where costs of playing are (I believe) significantly lower and worked out very differently from our Western monthly subscriptions.