Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-26-2008 @ 2:21PM
Sam said...
Firstly, credit here to the developers for being more creative in this new concept of AoE damage.
Secondly, I agree with spf that players should have the option of targeting a friendly, such as the tank.
Reply
9-26-2008 @ 2:25PM
Mason said...
That doesn't make any sense though...you're seering the mind of the target, which creates an AOE effect. Would it make sense to Mindseer someone on your team? No. You need to differentiate the actual spell mechanic and the name of the spell and it's purpose.
9-26-2008 @ 2:39PM
Candina@WH said...
I think, to make this spell complete (and to make the name make more sense) that the spell should Stun or Root the target and Damage the surrounding mobs.
Stun, head explodes, people around it get covered in goo. :-)
Go! Shadow Priest Go!
9-26-2008 @ 3:16PM
Galla said...
Or have the target take more damage, than the damage of the aoe... kinda like Mind Flay, with an aoe.
9-26-2008 @ 3:24PM
Candina@WH said...
Well, if we're redesigning the spell....
I'd make it a DOT. Sort of an Anti-Vamperic Embrace.
Mobs around the target take 33%/66%/100% of shadow damage inflicted on target of the DOT. And I would probably call the spell 'Shadow Overload' or 'Psychic Feedback'.
I don't like channeled spells.