Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-07-2008 @ 2:51PM
Siona said...
I'm on a Toshiba laptop, and I can run the beta just fine. Will this mean I'm able to run the expansion just fine, then?
Reply
10-07-2008 @ 2:55PM
Bloodletter said...
Meh, not sure.
I'm running the BETA pretty shittily at 10 - 15fps (even with the exactly same settings as TBC, which gives me 35 - 65FPS) - so I guess if you have good performance on BETA as compared to old TBC, the actual game release should give you the same performance.
What specs do you have?
I have 1.66GHz Centrino Duo, Geforce 8400M GS (64mb VRAM), 2gb RAM and WinVis Premium.
I was kinda hoping for more than 15fps with these specs, but I guess beggars can't be choosers.
10-07-2008 @ 2:58PM
Naix said...
Replace that 1.6 with a 3.0 ghz. They are only like $100 now.
10-07-2008 @ 3:04PM
gameleon said...
Bloodletter, are you sure youve turned shadow quality to low?
That's a new setting and takes a high load on your Grahic card.
10-07-2008 @ 3:57PM
vlad said...
hmm, you may want to scale back your settings sadly.
im getting between 60-80fps on beta @ 1920 x 1200. everything.
just using a single 512mb 8000gt
4gb ram
dual core 2.4ghz.
nothing bleeding edge.
10-07-2008 @ 4:23PM
vlad said...
err, typos. "everything maxxed" and "8800gt"