Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-08-2008 @ 4:39PM
Ryan said...
"A 72-hour ban isn't too big a deal"
a 72 hour ban also comes with a Final Warning, so if some poor sack has gotten one, he's an F-Bomb in Trade Chat away from getting perma-banned. 72 Hour bans shouldn't be handed out as a first punishment, and only through diligent investigation should Blizzard be hitting people with that severe a punishment.
Also. 9/10 people who receive bans generally deserve them, and try to play "Mickey the Dunce" when they get caught.
Reply
10-08-2008 @ 11:57PM
Wade said...
72 hour bans don't always come with a final warning
10-09-2008 @ 12:59AM
Harmun said...
I remember the first month I played this game, I got a 72 hour ban. I was fascinated by the AH, and had amassed a small fortune buying and selling (about 3k on a level 16). I got banned for gold buying!
I tried to appeal, but by the time someone got back to me, the ban had expired and I was playing agian. No apologies, no indication that they would change the automated flagging script that assumed I must have bought this gold, and as far as I know, I'm still on a final notice!
If I had one wish, it would be that Blizzard make the process a little more transparent. Or at least translucent- maybe allow for something like an appeals process, and for people who are found to be false positives, a record cleanse so they're not on some "probably bad customers" list.