U.K. Times covers BlizzCon
One of the Technology writers, Murad Ahmed, from the U.K. Times went to BlizzCon this past week and apparently had a pretty good time. I'm positive he doesn't actually play the game, and he admits to being a little lost, especially when it comes to the frenetic action of the professional arena tournament (although, truthfully, I often have a hard time following it too). But he did seem to hit upon the major draw of the convention -- namely, getting to hang with your fellow gamers, and hopefully guildies if you're lucky, and enjoying a giant get-together where the person next to you is virtually certain to get a WoW-related joke. As a bonus, Mr. Ahmed got to interview James Taplin, one of our readers (BlizzCon attendees will know him as one of the people at the WoW Insider meet-up, and later the 3rd place winner in the /silly competition), who confirmed that the social aspect of both the game and convention are really the big attraction. I think it's precisely that aspect that has a tendency to be somewhat overlooked by the mainstream media (although let's face it; it's probably not something you'll pick up on unless you've played the game with people you genuinely like), but the Times also covered the WorldWide Invitational here, so they're no strangers to Blizzard events. While there's no information in the article that's really new, it's an interesting and generally positive perspective on the convention.
Thanks to James and Rhys for writing in!
Filed under: Analysis / Opinion, Odds and ends, News items, BlizzCon, Worldwide Invitational






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Guts2h Oct 14th 2008 12:06AM
Given that the British paper has always been known simply as the "Times", to the best of my knowledge, I really had a WTF moment there. I can only assume that you did this to avoid confusing your less wellread readers with the "New York Times".
Very neat article, good to see a reporter taking a healthy outlook on Blizzcon. Last time Warcraft was mentioned in the media over here, it was to report on some psychologist doing his spiel on how addictive and destroying it apparently is. (Just like everything fun in life, I guess.)
Juneau Oct 14th 2008 2:42AM
Yeah, better than most Americans who call it the "London Times" though.
Allison Robert Oct 14th 2008 3:44AM
Yep - in the States (and especially in the Northeast, where I live) the "Times" is understood to be shorthand for the New York Times. If the article had appeared in the Guardian or the Daily Telegraph, for example, it's not really necessary to say the "U.K. Guardian" - but there are hundreds of papers around the world that either are, or are shorthanded, the "Times."
Anan Oct 14th 2008 1:01AM
by the way,are the new graphical changes implemented in the Tuesday patch?
or we will have to wait for the xpac to get the new graphical changes?
matt Oct 14th 2008 1:48AM
hello,in the next patch are they going to make it eazy getting from 60 to 70??....i haven'it read anything about it but i been told they are.
Axolotl Oct 14th 2008 2:16AM
Erm, that's a nice countdownclock you put up on your site, only it's six hours behind ... Europe FTW!
Axolotl Oct 14th 2008 2:17AM
And no, people in New Zealand are NOT allowed to tell how much the clock is behind :-P