Also on AOL
- Autos
- Technology
- Lifestyle
- Gaming
- Finance
- Entertainment on AOL
- Lifestyle on AOL
- Sports on AOL
- Travel on AOL
- More on AOL
Featured Galleries
Joystiq
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | About Our Ads

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-31-2008 @ 9:56PM
Saelorn said...
Interesting theory, and I can't say your point is entirely invalid, but some people care a great deal about words, and take great offense at the abuse of grammar. People should say what they mean.
It was not necessarily obvious that your argument against strong hybrid DPS relied on some sort of "greater utility" to increase the damage output of others. This, again, goes against their stated design goal with standardizing the buffs and de-buffs to allow interchangeability of characters. An argument could be made that the pure damage classes, since they never had tanking or healing to fall back on, have always offered great utility (crowd control being the greatest example of this).