Take the player, not the class

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

11-05-2008 @ 3:02PM

Sybrsean said...

Bah! I completely disagree with those of you happy with making every class the same. To make my point using an extreme: A typical warrior class player wants to be up close and hitting things. A mage class knows not to "get to close" to the fight and plays at range. Personalities choose classes that fit. If (again to exaggerate) A mage can tank and a tank can fight at range both just as effectively, WHY HAVE ANY CLASSES AT ALL??? Why have any skills that are any different. Just cookie cutter out 15 Skills that everyone uses regardless of their "Class - i.e. their now just their look in the game) and then.... as many of you are putting it... It's all about skills not class.

I think this KILLS one of the unique characteristics of WoW and disenfranchises tons of players that USED TO like their class. If I as a shadow preist wanted to be a huge DPSer I would get on my already made lock. Why the #@$% are they turning my Shadow Preist into a lock???? Why are there 4 Tank classes? With this thinking why not have all classes tank, why not have 1 talent tree for all classes.

I hate this change. It's lame.

Add your comments

Your comments:

Remember me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.