Shifting Perspectives: Let my kitties go!

I'll level with you; we have a huge Druid post in the pipeline that's going to round up the changes to the class in Wrath, new talents, new skills, new everything, and frankly I'm sick to death about reading or writing anything having to do with the expansion. So, just to buck the overwhelming trend that threatens to drive us all to the nuthouse, I'm going to turn to a topic that's plagued Druids for a while.
By this I mean the perennial form issue, something that my Druid colleagues on the blog have previously termed the Same Old Animal Posterior, or SOAP. But it's one that we've been given reason to believe will change in...Wrath. Well, that didn't last long. You'll note that David's article was written in October 2007, more than a year ago, but the same thing could have been posted in 2006 as well. Druid forms haven't changed since launch*, and while they were never really at the cutting edge of Blizzard's art direction as a result**, they look more and more shabby in relation to the higher-polygon models and landscapes. As everything around you gets better and better -- more evocative lighting, more intricate details, fantastic animation -- it's hard not to feel a strange sense of displacement as you shift into a 2004 form within a 2008 game.
But at long last we may see Druid form customization, an overhaul to the default forms themselves, or possibly (hopefully?) both.

Visible armor on animal forms
To be honest, I'm not wildly enthusiastic about this. I'm not sure how this could be implemented without it looking...words fail me...kind of dumb, or at best awkward. A lot of people really didn't like the look of the Amani War Bear for that reason. I really think there's something to the notion of a Druid being able to shapeshift into an animal that blends into the wild seamlessly (or as seamlessly as it gets when all of the real animals are hostile to you) and, whatever else you might think about it, a bear sporting a giant Uzi is not, per Mother Nature, working as intended.
New markings (new tattoos, symbols, scars) on animal formsThis has a lot of potential and would be a fantastic set of options to include with the barbershop-style customization that Ghostcrawler's hinted at, but I don't think it's going to be enough on its own. This is the band-aid-on-the-gangrenous-limb approach to the issue; it doesn't change the underlying model issues. And, worse yet, Tauren cat form doesn't have Druid markings on it to begin with; you can make the argument that we'd be paying to add something that should have been there in the first place. And on that note --
The unadulterated suck of Tauren cat form
You may have seen me make mention of my all-consuming hatred for this model here before. I hate this model. I hate it. There aren't many things in the game that I think merit a big fuss, but everyone has that one thing that drives them absolutely up a wall, and mine is Tauren cat form. It is the reason I spent as much time in the game as possible trying not to be feral, and only caved when I realized how bad the tanking shortage was on my realm. And it's one of the reasons, if I am very honest with myself, that I still spend as much time possible tanking and not DPSing.

Or -- no, it's worse than that. They could have used any of the cat models in the game as a placeholder graphic, and I find it excruciatingly ironic that cats are considered the most beautiful Hunter pets and are overwhelmingly popular in no small part because of it. The ugliest cat model in the game is the one that's being used by actual players, who have no choice over having to use it outside of not playing the class at all.I just -- I don't even know what else to say here. I hate this model. There's a reason why a petition to replace Tauren cat form was one of the most popular and consistent thread topics on the Druid class forums, and there's also a reason why Googling "tauren cat form" will present you with dozens of webpages offering suggestions on how it could be changed or illegally replaced ingame.
Overhauling the existing models
I have yet to meet anyone with a bad word to say about either version of swift flight form. They're beautiful. They're wonderfully designed with gorgeous coloration and fantastic, realistic animation whether they're flying or just sitting there peering at their surroundings. And, honestly, that's where a lot of Druid complaints are coming from, I think. We know that Blizzard has the capacity to make models that are a thousand times better than the ones that went live in classic WoW, and it stings a little to see an entire expansion full of things that look so much better than the character you worked hard to level and gear.
With that said, I do expect a certain percentage of players to want to keep the classic forms, or possibly switch back and forth as nostalgia dictates, so I'm hesitant over saying that the original forms (even -- /spit -- Tauren cat form) should be axed from the game completely. Should they remain the default, trainable forms? Well...maybe. There's still no denying that they're pretty archaic models for the game's increasingly advanced artistic sense.Glyphs
Buh-bye. The three previous glyphs to alter form appearances -- Glyph of the Red Lynx, Glyph of the Forest Lynx, and Glyph of the White Bear -- are technically in the game files but not active. Blizzard came to the conclusion (which I think most players agreed with) that it wasn't really fair to make Druids or Shamans use a glyph slot to customize their forms.
BarbershoppingThis is the most likely option now. We have no real information on how it's going to work, but there have been hints that Blizzard is planning to implement this in a major content patch to be released in the months after Wrath goes live. I have no qualms about saying that I look forward to this more than just about anything else in Wrath.
Conclusion
Druid form customization may seem like a small issue, especially to those who don't play a Druid as a main, but it's really not. It affects whether people choose to play Druids in the first place, affects how long they're willing to stick with the class, and has also had a significant impact on Druidic faction balance. The Night Elf forms are almost universally considered more aesthetically pleasing than their Tauren counterparts, and that's one of the reasons most commonly cited for the continued NE population advantage.
The class already has very few options from the moment you hit the character selection screen. You have to be a Night Elf if you play Alliance. You have to be a Tauren if you play Horde. You can't pick an Undead Druid because you like their casting animations more, or be a Human Druid because you prefer their racials. Once your initial choice is made, you know exactly what you are going to look like from 1-80 regardless of gear upgrades or time and effort spent in the endgame. And the only choices you'll have over how you look will require increasingly costly respecs in order to obtain the equally-dated moonkin or Tree of Life forms. In the absence of any real choice over how their character looks, most people would prefer not to play things that are widely seen as irredeemably ugly, or at the very least, extremely dated given the graphical improvements made to the game since its release.Please, Blizzard; let my kitties go!
*Yes, Tauren cat form was "improved" in patch 2.3. You may need to have a few beers and a long squinting session before you can really see the difference. Actually, if you're going to look at Tauren cat form for that long, may I suggest a few more beers?
**Until swift flight form. Hallelujah!
Filed under: (Druid) Shifting Perspectives, Night Elves, Tauren, Druid, Analysis / Opinion, Features, Wrath of the Lich King






Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)
Fuerion Nov 12th 2008 6:08AM
want a wah-burger to go witrh your french cries?
G Nov 12th 2008 7:08AM
Would you like a noob to go with your STFU?
Balius Nov 12th 2008 7:09AM
It's an actual issue being discussed intelligently. This isn't crying, this isn't demanding anything, it lists a problem, some potential solutions, what the developers have in mind, and does so respectfully.
This isn't crying, whining, or wailing and gnashing of teeth. It's a good article.
Crayfern Nov 12th 2008 7:48AM
Your prob either a Mage or a Rogue by the stupidness of your comment. Think about it this way....the clothes your character was wearing at lvl 40. Imagine you have the same clothing models now?
Would you be happy? The fact that you can stand next to someone who is lvl 40 and no one can tell you apart? Even though you have tanked ever major boss in the game?
If you are a Mage, think about how you lot cried when no one wanted to take you to instances cus a lock or shadow priest could do the job better. If your a rogue....well i feel sorry for you, prob the least wanted classes come 80 raiding.
Captain Gerbil Nov 12th 2008 9:22AM
nice article. I really do wish we could all look a little different in all of our forms. Everyone else looks different with their gear, why not let us have some customization; and yes being able to wear a battle helmet or something silly would rock the you no what.
The best thing I guess is that since we all look the same, its harder for people to tell us apart >
Fuerion Nov 12th 2008 10:49AM
you guys are easy to troll.
Fuerion Nov 12th 2008 11:06AM
You guys are hella serious too. Its silly, and i figured at worse someone would be like lol, that's retarded. And i figured i might really get under the kin of some really sensitive nerds. Druid gear is awesome if youre out of your form to see it.The models are clunky and old, but theres so much blizzard seems unwilling to do. Its more about bottom lines now then putting out an amazing polished product. Its a great unpolished product instead. And you druids have it all you can tank melee and ranged dps and heal with the best. So suck it up a little. Dont take yourselves so seriously when someone throws a gradeschool quip at you just chuckle and move on.
MooGooGaiPan Nov 12th 2008 6:12AM
Wiser words were never spoken. I don't even mind the tauren body so much, but the head/face is just so gawd awful, it makes me wonder what Blizzard was thinking!
I don't mind the trees, and I even like tauren bear form, compared to the NE one.
I was a serious /sad panda when I read the glyphs were removed because it 'wasn't fair'. Why not? I'm still sitting with an empty minor glyph spot that I'd gladly give to improve my catform appearance.
Azri Nov 12th 2008 6:13AM
The post you linked under the "we may see Druid form customization" link does not contain GC's answer to the customization question. In fact, he pointedly ignores the OP's comment about customization in that post.
Hudders Nov 12th 2008 6:23AM
"Blizzard came to the conclusion (which I think most players agreed with) that it wasn't really fair to make Druids or Shamans use a glyph slot to customize their forms."
I think that's what minor glyph slots should be for, to be honest. They should be used for aesthetic improvements and non-game-changing enhancements. You're not being "made to use a glyph slot" as it's entirely optional.
I chose glyph of lock-picking on my rogue purely as a matter of convenience; does it make me hit harder or crit more often? No.
improbable Nov 12th 2008 6:30AM
Except that a number of glyphs do provide very real game enhancement. Druids get a minor glyph to reduce the cooldown of Dash. I think rogues get something similar. Particularly in PVP, that's a fantastic improvement, and if you use Dash at all you'd have to be an idiot to give it up for a mere cosmetic improvement.
Cy Nov 12th 2008 6:33AM
I agree, this is exactly what minor glyphs are for. I'd cite the example of the penguin polymorph glyph: It does nothing other than make a traditional polymorph look a bit different.
There are much bigger issues with the game for the developers to work on. Maybe if the model designers have some free time after they finish designing all the other raid instances for Wrath, sure, go for some slightly better druid forms.
On the bright side, we're more likely to see improved/customizable druid forms before we see a properly working vanish or blink spell.
derella Nov 12th 2008 6:50AM
@Hudders and Cy: I agree completely. Minor Glyphs are already used for purely cosmetic/convenience changes. Why are druids special in this regard?
uncaringbear Nov 12th 2008 7:07AM
Yes, minor glyphs should be used for fun or non-critical functionality. This is already done with examples such as the Glyph of the Penguin. I don't see why Druids should be exempt from this.
Aubrecia Nov 12th 2008 7:20AM
I think it's because druids are staring at their (as it's put in the article) SOAPs all the time. If we're fighting, we're usually shifted, and so it's an aesthetic change more on the level with the haircuts that were recently implemented -- because it's something we're staring at all the time. Mages don't always have to sheep, and sometimes can't, in instances, and lockpicking is a matter of convenience, not looks. It's more of a comparison with if Blizzard had required glyph use to change your character's hair, piercings, etc. We just see animal ass more often than we see our hair, so, naturally, it's what we'd want to change.
Hudders Nov 12th 2008 7:24AM
@Aubrecia
Why be so adverse to making it a glyph? What glyph is it that you'd rather have in your minor glyph slot right now?
The argument is that minor glyph slots should be used for minor adjustments at personal preference. I think it's entirely fair that druids should use them for that; you're not being forced into it, it's entirely your choice.
Aubrecia Nov 12th 2008 7:26AM
@Hudders
Oh, I'm not adverse to making it a glyph at all -- in fact I'd eagerly use both a bear and a cat glyph if they were still usable ingame. I was looking forward to them, personally. Either way it works is just fine with me, to be honest, as long as it happens.
I'm just trying to trace the line of logic Blizz might have followed for this.
Shanic Nov 12th 2008 10:38AM
@ Hudders
Given the amount of complaints on the forums, and the lack of any other option, and the potential for it to be the only option, was the primary reason this was heavily slandered both on the live and beta forums as an option. Glyphs FELT like a force if it was going to be the only way to adjust forms, and the only way Blizzard was going to use to correct what is a very real problem.
Now glyphs in conjunction to barbershop or other ideas would be fine, but the whole idea probably got ransacked.
Hudders Nov 12th 2008 11:06AM
@Shanic
In which case the Druids have made a rod for their own backs. By criticising the idea of being able to change their forms through glyphs so vehemently, they have inadvertently caused that option to be withdrawn and not replaced by anything.
And it's not a real problem. Have some perspective. It's not even a real problem in the context of World of Warcraft when there are real game-breaking problems still out there waiting for a fix.
Groth Nov 12th 2008 11:39AM
Glyphs are there to make our lives easier, speeding up actions, reducing cool-downs, removing the need for reagents, tweaking spell effects etc.
Minor Glyphs as cosmetic changes- Lets see, theres Glyph of the Bear cub and Glyph of the Penguin. Both are minor mage Glyphs and are the ONLY cosmetic ones in the game. Kinda easy to say they should all be cosmetic when you dont have any to chose isnt it?
Making druid form customisation glyphed (as most of the complaints stated) meant that pretty much any druid is going to have to chose between utility minor glyphs and actually getting to look different for the first time in YEARS when we fight.
I agree, this is a choice that each druid would have to face individually. Personally, I'd have given up a glyph slot to stop looking at the worst model in wow, but thats just me. Two slots though? Well maybe I could have lived with bear form...
Personally I think that Blizz made the right call with not making our forms use Glyphs. I also think mages got gypped and everyones so use to mage QQing that no-ones noticed (plus penguins ftw!)